Readers Defend XBRL - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management
Commentary
3/17/2006
11:46 AM
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary
50%
50%

Readers Defend XBRL

A story we ran this week about XBRL managed to ignite a little controversy, even before it made our newsletter.

A story we ran this week about XBRL managed to ignite a little controversy, even before it made our newsletter.XBRL is an XML-based format for financial reporting that provides a computer-readable way to tag financial data points such as cost, assets, net profit and other values. For a primer on the technology, read this story from August 2005. As Intelligence Enterprise reported more recently, many publicly traded companies have been reluctant to adopt the standard. But that wasn't the story that ticked off some Business Intelligence readers.

Robert Kugel of Ventana Research argues in a recent article, called The Danger of XBRL, that there's a chance the Securities and Exchange Commission will use XBRL as a "back door" to regulating the structure of corporate charts of accounts.

Some readers didn't like hearing that.

Colm O hAonghusa of EuroReg Consulting, in Dublin, Ireland, called the story "McCarthyism journalism." I don't know what that means, but he seems dedicated to the idea. In a point-by-point e-mail responding to Kugel, O hAonghusa said, among other things, that the Financial Accounting Standards Board and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board "don't need XBRL as a Trojan Horse for a standardised chart of accounts. They will come in the front door if that is what they want. A standardised chart of accounts will bring more Enrons, not better accounting transparency which is what XBRL can bring."

O hAonghusa also pointed out that companies' reported financial information is already parsed and tagged by third-party intermediaries before it's sold to equity analysts. The data is made to conform to intermediaries' standards when this happens -- which in effect results in the creation of a standardized chart of accounts. XBRL, he noted, is designed to correct this problem.

Mike Willis, a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, seconded O hAonghusa's position. (In fact, he matched it verbatim, word-for-word in parts. This leads me to believe that either Willis is reading O hAonghusa, O hAonghusa is reading Willis, or they're both reading someone else.) At any rate, Willis added, "XBRL will likely eliminate existing third party definitions applied to company reports and [enable] companies to provide users exactly what they report in a highly reusable and explicit manner."

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Becoming a Self-Taught Cybersecurity Pro
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  6/9/2021
News
Ancestry's DevOps Strategy to Control Its CI/CD Pipeline
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  6/4/2021
Slideshows
IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Slideshows
Flash Poll