A Kindler, Gentler Microsoft Won't Happen From Within - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Enterprise Architecture
Commentary
2/22/2008
11:40 AM
Serdar Yegulalp
Serdar Yegulalp
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

A Kindler, Gentler Microsoft Won't Happen From Within

Microsoft's recent announcements about its new openness initiatives have been greeted with great skepticism.  They deserve to be, because Microsoft deserves to be changed for the better -- but it's only going to come from the outside, not the inside.

Microsoft's recent announcements about its new openness initiatives have been greeted with great skepticism.  They deserve to be, because Microsoft deserves to be changed for the better -- but it's only going to come from the outside, not the inside.

I don't believe Steve Ballmer for a second when he says that the recent change in strategy to open up documentation about Windows and Office was something it was taking on its own.  You can bet that this is only happening because of continual and unrelenting pressure from regulators, rivals, and, yes, customers to make this happen.  It's not so much a way for the company to better embrace openness and connectedness as it is a face-saving gesture, a way to send a signal that, gee shucks, its really not all that bad.

Truth be told, Microsoft can do great things when motivated to do so.  It's just that the main motivation on its end is to protect its turf and to lock customers into their way of doing things.  That's how it's consistently been, and it only has ever backed off from that stance in any respect after being hit in the face with it again and again.

It's been said, and with a straight face, that if Microsoft disappeared tomorrow the IT industry would be arguably no worse off for it and probably a good deal better.  That said, Microsoft is still profitable, and isn't planning on adopting a business model that would undermine that (read: open source).  There are plenty of people who are still willing to pay good money for Microsoft products, despite the lock-in (I confess I'm one such person myself; viz. MS Office), and as long as they continue to do so, Microsoft only has to pretend to play fair. 

This is the question as I see it: Should the beast be tamed?  Would it be worth the effort to make Microsoft reshape itself into a real force for good?  It certainly won't happen from the inside, if it does happen.  The only way to get Microsoft to do anything good for the industry as a whole -- or just to keep it from making things worse -- is to keep applying a steady and resolute pressure.  It's the only thing that seems to work.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Slideshows
IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
Commentary
Preparing for the Upcoming Quantum Computing Revolution
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  6/3/2021
News
How SolarWinds Changed Cybersecurity Leadership's Priorities
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  5/26/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Slideshows
Flash Poll