Justice Dept. Supports Oracle In EU Dispute - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management

Justice Dept. Supports Oracle In EU Dispute

The U.S. agency's antitrust division said Oracle's purchase of Sun wouldn't harm competition in the database market.

The U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division has sided with Oracle in its dispute with the European Union over the firm's proposed purchase of Sun Microsystems. The issue centers primarily on whether combining Sun's open source MySQL with Oracle's proprietary enterprise database is anticompetitive.

The antitrust division's stance, announced late Monday, wasn't entirely unexpected, because it previously examined the issue after Oracle made its bid for Sun in April. After examining the proposed merger, the division approved it.

"After conducting a careful investigation of the proposed transaction between Oracle and Sun, the Department's Antitrust Division concluded that the merger is unlikely to be anticompetitive. This conclusion was based on the particular facts of the transaction and the Division's prior investigations in the relevant industries," said deputy assistant attorney general Molly Boast in a statement.

Noting that the DOJ unit and the EU regulatory agency share a "strong and positive relationship on competition policy matters," Boast said the antitrust division hopes that the EU and the two companies reach a speedy resolution benefitting EU consumers.

In her statement, Boast noted that the DOJ investigation determined that the large MySQL community has enough developers and users of the open source database to continue to maintain and improve the software and "could support a derivative version of it."

"There are many open-source and proprietary database competitors," Boast said. "The Division concluded, based on the specific facts at issue in the transaction, that consumer harm is unlikely because customers would continue to have choices from a variety of well established and widely accepted database products."

EU and U.S. antitrust agencies units often see eye-to-eye on violations, although the degree and individual issues may differ somewhat. For instance, regulatory agencies in the U.S. and the EU complained of regulatory violations by Microsoft and Intel.

Earlier in the decade, the DOJ charged Oracle with antitrust violations when it moved to acquire PeopleSoft. However, Oracle prevailed in U.S. federal courts and went on to acquire PeopleSoft.


InformationWeek Analytics has published an independent analysis on application delivery. Download the report here (registration required).

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Slideshows
Reflections on Tech in 2019
James M. Connolly, Editorial Director, InformationWeek and Network Computing,  12/9/2019
Slideshows
What Digital Transformation Is (And Isn't)
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/4/2019
Commentary
Watch Out for New Barriers to Faster Software Development
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  12/3/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll