The Observer: Of Sealing Wax And Cabbages, Of Innovators And Copycats - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

06:16 PM
Lou Bertin
Lou Bertin

The Observer: Of Sealing Wax And Cabbages, Of Innovators And Copycats

Being fashionable often benefits those who imitate, says Lou Bertin, but it's time to look at change and change agents and see just who's worth imitating.

"Fashion is something barbarous, for it produces innovation without reason and imitation without benefit." Thus wrote George Santayana a century ago in The Life of Reason. It's a fool's errand to disagree with ole' Georgie, but with the energy that comes with the transiting of the obliquity of the ecliptic (as the nuns who taught me in grammar school would advise, "if you don't know what it means, look it up"), I'll give it a shot.

Lord knows we've all seen enough of the "innovation without reason" part of Santayana's observation. I believe it was known as the " explosion' and resulting implosion. Sic transit hysteria. In that case, enough was too much, as would be any further discussion of that particular folly.

I will, though, take question with the "imitation without benefit" portion of Santayana's wisdom. If fashion is defined as something that attracts sufficient favorable attention (and results) that it draws imitators and emulators, I think fashion can be a wonderful thing. Specifically, if "fashion" is defined as the very good practices embodied by the best and most enlightened outfits out there, then I'm compelled to posit that imitation is almost always a benefit-bearing beast.

Hearteningly, we're now well into a period where we're blessed with fashions that will surely pass the test of time and are well worth imitating for the benefits they've borne to the trend-setters and will bear to those wise enough to imitate the fashion-forward bunch.

I could cite dozens of examples, but a couple come immediately to mind. They range from the sublime--think of the subtle but utterly compelling re-making of IBM--to the supremely functional--think of Georgia Marsh, agency expert for identity policy and management in the United States' Government Services Administration's Office of Electronic Government and Technology's Office of Governmentwide Policy (and if ever there were a case for government simplification, Georgia's title is Exhibit A) striving to have trusted and regulated authenticators of individual citizens' identities take some responsibility for authentication of same.

Neither IBM nor the estimable Ms. Marsh (full confession time: Georgia is a great friend to InformationWeek and has been a contributor to our conferences and events) are breaking new ground. What they're doing is following fashion. They're emulating as fully as they possibly can the things that have made other organizations successful and that's a wonderful thing. There's no benefit to reinventing the wheel and none of us get extra points for doing things the hard way, though our behaviors occasionally betray a preference for delivering at least the impression of enormous struggle to accomplish the obvious.

Here's where following fashion, despite Santayana's admonitions, can indeed provide benefit.

For its part, IBM is demonstrating that a bone-deep will to focus on customer needs pays off. IBM knows that there's a huge and festering resentment out there among organizations that have been force-fed "solutions" that suit either "standards" or solutions-provider self interests. So what does it do? IBM merely sets about the business of turning the proverbial aircraft carrier on a dime. Easy? Nope. Necessary? Probably not; IBM could have coasted and waited "the Linux thing" out. The right thing? Absolutely. It says here that there's a sea change afoot and that IBM has aligned itself with the winner. Scary and risky for IBM; ultimately smart and beneficial.

Today, technology patrons are voting and will vote with increasing frequency over the course of 2004 in this election-without-end. Don't bet on the incumbent. Is IBM following fashion? Of course. Sooner or later, if any outfit takes care of its customers, those customers will take care of it. Trouble is, the outfit may need to change for that to happen. The outfit known as IBM is doing so.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
1 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

New Storage Trends Promise to Help Enterprises Handle a Data Avalanche
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  4/1/2021
11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
How to Submit a Column to InformationWeek
InformationWeek Staff 4/9/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll