Forced Updates: Here Comes Drama And Expense - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IT Leadership // CIO Insights & Innovation
08:06 AM
Connect Directly

Forced Updates: Here Comes Drama And Expense

Pushing software updates creates big problems for the enterprise, and CIOs need to use their purchasing clout and register their displeasure.

8 DevOps Lessons IT Can Teach The Enterprise
8 DevOps Lessons IT Can Teach The Enterprise
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

As readers of my column know, I tend to have a bias for forward progress. So, it's a little out of character for me to blast forced software updates as an incredibly bad idea. Yet, that's where it's going for mobile platforms, and it is an incredibly bad idea for the enterprise.

Let me be clear -- I am in favor of software updates and forward progress. I am not in favor of forcing updates, not only because this essentially removes choice from customers, but because it will create drama and expense at enterprise organizations.

What do I mean by drama and expense?

Well, we all know that consumers aren't the enterprise, but that consumer experiences, in micro, sometimes approximate the enterprise, in macro. So let's take a consumer experience as an instructive example.

Your TV should work. All the time. Yet, smart TVs have taken a half page from Amazon (which forces Kindle updates) and a half page from Apple (which pesters the user unmercifully until the user relents and updates). 

(Image: Mathias Rosenthal/iStockphoto)

(Image: Mathias Rosenthal/iStockphoto)

A friend of mine bought a Samsung Smart TV, and was pretty happy with it. Happy with it, that is, until one day when it stopped working. One fine day, my friend turned it on and the TV simply would not respond to the HDMI input coming from the cable box. "No signal," it said. Except, there was a signal.

I helped my friend in the way that you'd help your friend -- swapping TVs, localizing the fault domain, blah blah blah. It turned out that it was definitely the TV's fault, not the cable box. The only thing that would make the TV accept the HDMI input was to physically unplug it and plug it back in.

I had my friend call Samsung, where the tech support rep says something to the effect of, "Oh yeah, well, there was a bad software update. Sorry."

To be fair to Samsung, in about a week, the company pushed out another update that fixed the problem.

But let's think about how this would play out at the enterprise scale: Stuff doesn't work. For a week. Everywhere. #TotalChaos.

I'm not saying that forward progress is bad. In fact, I'm the first to say that the brave new world of software-as-a-service (SaaS) has a significant resourcing advantage over the "perpetual licensing model." 

But SaaS has now evolved into "hardware-as-a-service," where manufacturers feel like they can  mandate updates (like Amazon), pester users so much that they finally give in (like Apple), and create updates that make the hardware act in horrible ways that make you want to replace it. Cha-ching! Revenue!

From a capitalist standpoint, I admire the players, like Apple, which issue mandatory, non-reversible updates that slow down the hardware to the point where the consumer is forced to open their wallet to buy something new.

But from the enterprise standpoint? We're in charge of making technology actually work. When I get complaints from police officers (as I did with the first rev of iOS 9), that causes my blood to chill. They need stuff to work. Every day. 

[Build enterprise better apps. Read Bad User Experiences: How Analytics Can Improve App Testing.]

Forced upgrades, together with the inability to at least temporarily undo the upgrade, is going to cause expense and drama at just about every IT organization. It means that the life cycle of the device will shrink as manufacturers speed up updates and make older devices go slower and slower.

I don't know what the ultimate answer is. I know that the answer is not to "just give up on these platforms." There's just too much benefit. If there wasn't, we'd still be carrying around BlackBerrys. But, ultimately, CIOs of large organizations need to use their purchasing clout and register their displeasure with these practices.

Yes, there are kludgy ways of turning off auto-update pestering on some of these platforms, depending on your mobile device management (MDM) software, but manufacturers have taken pains to make it inconvenient. At some point, the workarounds probably won't work anymore. 

Meanwhile, you'd better budget for the personnel and resourcing to deal with the consequences of forced or "consequence of pestering" updates. Also, keep your eyes out for emerging platforms that keep the benefit to the end-user, but are a little more enterprise-IT friendly.

Are you an IT Hero? Do you know someone who is? Submit your entry now for InformationWeek's IT Hero Award. Full details and a submission form can be found here.

Jonathan Feldman is Chief Information Officer for the City of Asheville, North Carolina, where his business background and work as an InformationWeek columnist have helped him to innovate in government through better practices in business technology, process, and human ... View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
2/28/2016 | 6:59:27 PM
Not much of a pestering
> and a half page from Apple (which pesters the user unmercifully until the user relents and updates). Pesters? I've experienced that all Apple does is a constant notification on the Settings that you can not remove. But you can choose to ignore for as long as you want to. Not much of a pestering!!!
User Rank: Ninja
2/24/2016 | 9:57:35 AM
This isn't new
"But let's think about how this would play out at the enterprise scale: Stuff doesn't work. For a week. Everywhere. #TotalChaos."

We've seen all kinds of little issue pop up on cell phones, laptops with manufacturer update packages and even servers with similar update packages.  In most cases you get some warning but if your TV or cell phone tells you at 3AM that it's about to do an update you don't stand much of a chance.  I think this is one of the reasons so many people are upset about Microsoft pushing Win10 upgrades to everyone and now pushing patches in a similar fashion.  Yes it solves the problem of exploits that could be stopped by regular patching but they can't know how every single system will respond. 

User Rank: Ninja
2/24/2016 | 3:23:06 AM
scary updates
thank you, interesting reading... after dealing with updates as tech. desk support... 

I would not recommend update right away after patch get available

I would say wait and see with updates it a best way...

as example xbox 360 updates troubles...

10 Ways to Transition Traditional IT Talent to Cloud Talent
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  11/23/2020
What Comes Next for the COVID-19 Computing Consortium
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  11/24/2020
Top 10 Data and Analytics Trends for 2021
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  11/13/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Why Chatbots Are So Popular Right Now
In this IT Trend Report, you will learn more about why chatbots are gaining traction within businesses, particularly while a pandemic is impacting the world.
Flash Poll