Report: Oracle Patch Turns On $23,000 Upgrade - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management
News
7/25/2014
12:43 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail

Report: Oracle Patch Turns On $23,000 Upgrade

Oracle is shipping its Database In-Memory feature with its latest patch, but the expensive option is reportedly turned on by default.

Oracle's Database In-Memory feature certainly has its appeal, but a database expert says the $23,000-per-CPU option is turned on by default in a new software patch.
Oracle's Database In-Memory feature certainly has its appeal, but a database expert says the $23,000-per-CPU option is turned on by default in a new software patch.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
D. Henschen
100%
0%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
7/29/2014 | 10:36:49 PM
Oracle's Response
On 7/28, Oracle's Master Product Manager for Oracle Database In-Memory published a detailed, technical blog post that insists that this optional feature is NOT automatically enabled. The optional feature is installed along with the 12.1.0.2 release because it's an intrinsic part of the database, according to Oracle's Maria Colgan, but she wrote that enabling the feature requires a deliberate, two-step process whereby memory is allocated to the feature. Read the details here.
License Consulting
50%
50%
License Consulting,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/29/2014 | 4:36:43 AM
same old same old
This has never been any different. By default Oracle will install and enable most of the options. What's a lot worse, that an innocent Standard Edition One user is able to use Enterprise Edition Options which shouldn't be available in the first place.

For example, an Oracle SE One user can run with 1 Processor license on a single CPU 8-Core Server, at a cost of $5.800 for the Oracle license. But if a dba would run Medium compression instead of Basic compression - even when the V$Option table the Advanced Compression is set on FALSE this will actually work - Oracle will tell the client to buy Database Enterprise Edition and Advanced Security for $236.000.- instead. We've seen Oracle trying to get away with such compliance claims even in situations where the client was able to demonstrate that the DBA only ran compression for testing the feature. So while this article seems alarming, it is one of the more "innocent" traps for Oracle clients. In our experience, the majority of Oracle's claims with regard to Database options are based on false-positives.
TerryB
50%
50%
TerryB,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2014 | 1:54:47 PM
Re: Honor System Vs. Trust-But-Verify
"relies on honor system". Yeah, for one of two reasons, neither which reflect well on Oracle. Either they are too incompetent to build a licensing control system or, most probable, they want you to turn that stuff on accidently so they can charge you for it.

If you are silly enough to deal with Oracle in first place, that stuff comes with territory. The maintenance fee troll of the IT world. I feel very sorry for the JD Edwards customers (and many other vendors Oracle snatched up) who are stuck with these guys when they certainly never intended to be.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
7/25/2014 | 7:04:51 PM
Re: Oracle Acknowledges Optional Feature Ships Turned On
But it this new feature worth $23,000-per-CPU? At that price, I'd be tempted to process the data with pencil and paper.
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
7/25/2014 | 2:45:21 PM
Honor System Vs. Trust-But-Verify
I'm working on a feature on software licensing currently and in a recent interview, IDC analyst Amy Mizoras Konary told me Oracle is one of the few vendors that relies on the honor system, whereby it ships all sorts of software and lets you use it whether you have licensed it or not. It has no mechanisms, other than software audits, to alert you whether you are actually entited to use these features. The danger, or course, is that DBAs and app administrators will install, turn on, and start using all sorts of features only discover in an audit that they owe a lot more than they realized. Negotiated discounts could go out the window, too.

Most vendors take what she called a "trust but verify" approach whereby notifications are triggered when you try to use or install features that you're not currently entitled to use -- or at least the notification will warn you that it's an extra-cost feature that you have to be licensed to use. This helps avoid those audit surprises.
Commentary
Augmented Analytics Drives Next Wave of AI, Machine Learning, BI
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  3/19/2020
Slideshows
How Startup Innovation Can Help Enterprises Face COVID-19
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  3/24/2020
Commentary
Enterprise Guide to Robotic Process Automation
Cathleen Gagne, Managing Editor, InformationWeek,  3/23/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT Careers: Tech Drives Constant Change
Advances in information technology and management concepts mean that IT professionals must update their skill sets, even their career goals on an almost yearly basis. In this IT Trend Report, experts share advice on how IT pros can keep up with this every-changing job market. Read it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll