Incumbents IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, and SAP have ruled the Gartner Magic Quadrant for operational database management systems for years. But with the rise of open source and cloud, new competition has gained ground. Here's what you need to know.

Jessica Davis, Senior Editor

October 16, 2015

4 Min Read
<p align="left">(Image: 3alexd/iStockphoto)</p>

10 In-Memory Database Options Power Speedy Performance

10 In-Memory Database Options Power Speedy Performance


10 In-Memory Database Options Power Speedy Performance (Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

A few years ago it may have seemed as if the enterprise market for operational database management systems was impenetrable to any but incumbent vendors. Every year the same big four -- IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, and SAP -- ruled the Leadership square in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for the category. What's the old saying? Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.

That still may be the case. But a new batch of companies has made its way into the Leadership quadrant of this Gartner report this year. Among the contenders are companies like AWS, DataStax, and MongoDB. So what's going on?

In a nutshell, the market is changing to encompass new kinds of players. That means more organizations will be moving to NoSQL technologies for particular use-cases and will be embracing open source solutions.

[Looking for more about Amazon's plans to disrupt the database market? Read Amazon Urges Proprietary Database Customers to Migrate.]

Gartner VP and distinguished analyst Donald Feinberg, who is one of the authors of this report, told InformationWeek that NoSQL providers have indeed gained ground, but not in traditional apps.

"I do not believe you will see them used widely for ERP or others," he said. "But Web-scale apps requiring geo-distributed replicas are a strength of NoSQL. Also, note the strength of the cloud-based solutions AWS and Redis Labs. They are beginning to mature and gain ground."

Kelly Stirman, MongoDB's VP of strategy and product marketing told InformationWeek in an interview that technology has become a competitive differentiator for companies, and so has data. Web-enabled applications have put new demands on systems.

"Customers are always connected, and you expect a continuous fulfilling experience on companies' applications online," he said. "Organizations are asking 'How quickly can I get to market with my application? How quickly can I maneuver in the market?' The forces are really different than they were 30 years ago."

Stirman pointed to mobile applications as a key use-case, and said that many organizations are favoring NoSQL databases such as MongoDB for these. For example, he pointed to Facebook's acquisition of Parse two years ago, a mobile application framework company. "Parse runs entirely on MongoDB."

DataStax issued its own statement following its inclusion in the Leaders square of this year's report.

"Just as we saw tectonic shifts in the database market from mainframe to client-server, we are now experiencing a similar shift to distributed databases as web, mobile and Internet of Things applications are driving radically new data management requirements," said Billy Bosworth, CEO of DataStax, in the statement issued this week.

Does that mean the incumbents are headed into the sunset? Not at all, but for some use-cases, they'll be seeing more competition, Feinberg said.

"If JSON is required, then the incumbents are also supporting that," he said. "Also, some have created competition for the NoSQL -- IBM Cloudant, Microsoft DocumentDB, Oracle NoSQL. I do not believe the new guys will have much impact on the incumbents for five years minimum."

Open source has also gained momentum.

"Open source is different," Feinberg said. "Most clients want the open source pricing model and are not really interested in the source code. This is causing the open source DBMSs to cut into the incumbents. The incumbents hope that the cloud model will help here, as there [are] no upfront license costs associated with database Platform-as-a-Service."

Cloud-based systems have entered the report this year, too. Two cloud-based providers have made their debut in this Gartner Magic Quadrant report, most notably AWS in the Leaders quadrant. AWS beat out incumbents IBM and SAP on the Ability-to-Execute axis of Gartner's Magic Quadrant.

AWS offers Amazon Relational Database Services (RDS for Aurora, Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, and PostgreSQL) and Amazon DynamoDB (a NoSQL document and key-value DBMS). 

Another cloud-based provider, Redis Labs, also edged into the Leaders Quadrant. Others listed in the Leaders square this year included EnterpriseDB, MarkLogic, and InterSystems. 

About the Author(s)

Jessica Davis

Senior Editor

Jessica Davis is a Senior Editor at InformationWeek. She covers enterprise IT leadership, careers, artificial intelligence, data and analytics, and enterprise software. She has spent a career covering the intersection of business and technology. Follow her on twitter: @jessicadavis.

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights