GAO Faults Federal Spending Site - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management
News
3/15/2010
12:18 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

GAO Faults Federal Spending Site

The Government Accountability Office finds data quality on USASpending.gov lacking, and urges the White House to add subcontractor data to the site.

The government needs to do a better job tracking contracts and grant awards on USAspending.gov, its primary federal spending transparency Website, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office, the government's internal auditing agency.

In a report and survey of awards posted on USAspending.gov, the GAO found that the Office of Management and Budget, which oversees the Website, is far behind schedule in including subcontractor spending data on the site as required, has failed to submit a required report on the site's use, and needs to clear up reporting guidance to agencies. It's an indication that even though transparency is a major Obama administration initiative, the task is easier said than done.

For example, after missing a 2007 deadline to launch a pilot effort to post subcontractor spending data to USAspending.gov, the OMB's eventual pilot to integrate that data didn't yield enough information to develop a thorough plan. OMB still has not begun including subcontractor spending data on the site.

GAO also found discrepancies in data reported on USAspending.gov and agency records, including blank data fields and inconsistencies with agency data. The GAO repeatedly found records lacking titles describing the purpose of the award and where the work was to be performed. GAO attributed these problems at least partially to a lack of OMB guidance on how agencies should fill in the fields and validate data submissions.

Overall, in a sample of 100 randomly surveyed awards, GAO found blank, inconsistent, or inadequate data in more than 5 of 17 data fields in almost 4/3 of those awards, and in at least one data field in 93 of the 100 sampled awards.

In a few cases, agencies did not report awards to USAspending.gov at all. Again, GAO faulted OMB for failing to create a process to identify non-reporting agencies and instead relying on voluntary compliance.

Additionally, GAO found, the Federal Procurement Data System - Next Generation, which collects information on contracts and procurement, doesn't let agencies submit funding sources for awards, which means that agencies have to separately report that data to OMB for USASpending.gov

The report recommends that the OMB director Peter Orszag take additional steps to firm up USAspending.gov, including: developing a formal plan for collecting and reporting subcontractor data; creating a process to ensure agencies report all award data; and revising guidance to clarify requirements for describing awards and validating award data.

According to the report, OMB plans to create a data quality dashboard of agency submissions, and, consistent with the Open Government Directive, the administration will issue additional guidance regarding internal controls over agency data. OMB also said it would be issuing a report on USAspending.gov's use sometime this year. Parts of OMB's recommendations may also be addressed by the updated version of USAspending.gov, which is due out soon.

USAspending.gov does have a data quality page with a large number of data points, but its usefulness has been questioned by open government advocates at the Sunlight Foundation. Data completeness metrics listed there show much more complete data than found by the GAO, and that site doesn't note whether the data is actually accurate.

The site's design has been described as a failure and it's graphical representations of data have been called into question.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Slideshows
11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
News
Time to Shift Your Job Search Out of Neutral
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  3/31/2021
Commentary
Does Identity Hinder Hybrid-Cloud and Multi-Cloud Adoption?
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  4/1/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Slideshows
Flash Poll