Microsoft .NET's Sudden Ubiquity - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Enterprise Applications

Microsoft .NET's Sudden Ubiquity

In a too-good-to-be-true turn of events for enterprises, Microsoft ports .NET development framework to Linux and Mac OS and open-sources the entire .NET stack.

The headlines read like the imaginative claims of an April Fool's story or a satirical sortie from the Onion: Microsoft open sources full .NET stack. Microsoft ports .NET to Linux and Mac OS. Microsoft boosts free tools versions to compete evenly with its paid editions. And yet, it's all true.

On Wednesday, Microsoft announced sweeping changes in its tools division that made the earlier advances this year look like minor events. Of the announcements, the most important by far is the commitment to put .NET on all major platforms. Microsoft itself will handle delivering .NET on Linux and Mac OS. It will depend on tighter cooperation with Xamarin to address the mobile sector.

Of these platforms, Linux is clearly the most important. Microsoft currently earns much of its record profits from enterprise software packages including SQL Server, SharePoint and Exchange. By running .NET on Linux, it now has the ability to run those apps on a significant majority of server platforms. Except for Solaris sites, all enterprises will be able to run the applications without having to add in the cost of Microsoft Server licenses.

Read the rest of this article on Dr. Dobb's

 

Prior to joining Dr. Dobb's Journal, Andrew Binstock worked as a technology analyst, as well as a columnist for SD Times, a reviewer for InfoWorld, and the editor of UNIX Review. Before that, he was a senior manager at Price Waterhouse. He began his career in software ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
11/16/2014 | 2:25:04 PM
No Choice
I do not think Microsoft had a choice but to do this. In order to get your frameworks to the most amount of people, you have to open your platform.

Things have changed dramatically in the past ten years, and many people in technology have moved away from Microsoft over to Linux and/or Mac. This is one of the reason why .NET needs to be on these OSs, a move I applaud. 
Andrew Binstock
50%
50%
Andrew Binstock,
User Rank: Author
11/18/2014 | 3:37:19 AM
MS had no choice.
Quite agreed, as you can tell from the article itself. Thank you! 
News
COVID-19: Using Data to Map Infections, Hospital Beds, and More
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  3/25/2020
Commentary
Enterprise Guide to Robotic Process Automation
Cathleen Gagne, Managing Editor, InformationWeek,  3/23/2020
Slideshows
How Startup Innovation Can Help Enterprises Face COVID-19
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  3/24/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT Careers: Tech Drives Constant Change
Advances in information technology and management concepts mean that IT professionals must update their skill sets, even their career goals on an almost yearly basis. In this IT Trend Report, experts share advice on how IT pros can keep up with this every-changing job market. Read it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll