Federal IT Reform: Are More Laws Needed? - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Government // Leadership
03:02 PM
Connect Directly

Federal IT Reform: Are More Laws Needed?

Efforts by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., could lead to significant reform of federal IT management and acquisition.

IW500: 15 Top Government Tech Innovators
IW500: 15 Top Government Tech Innovators
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
There's a move afoot to use legislation to reform federal IT acquisition and management, an idea that appears to be gaining some steam.

Congressional hearings frequently pass with nary a whiff of consequential reform, but two hearings in the last month -- both punctuated by a bipartisan tone and proposed legislation -- indicate that the House of Representatives is serious about using 2013 to overhaul the way the federal government spends money on and manages IT.

The charge has been led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Issa said Wednesday at a hearing of that committee that he plans to introduce the Federal Information Technology Reform Act (FITARA) within the next three weeks.

In September 2012, Issa and Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., floated a now widely-circulated draft version of FITARA. The draft bill would give more spending power to agency CIOs, codify federal data center consolidation and open-source and cloud-computing guidance, encourage strategic sourcing, establish a Federal Commodity IT Center to coordinate IT acquisition and manage government-wide IT contracts, and strengthen the federal IT acquisition workforce, among other effects.

[ How effective has Obama been at changing the way the government uses IT? Read Obama's IT Transformation Is A Work In Progress. ]

In hearings in January and again on Wednesday, members of the committee, including ranking member Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and Rep. Danny Davis, D-Ill., expressed bipartisan support for Issa's efforts. "We are talking about how do we get the most mileage out of the money we spend, how do we create the systems and the workforce that will give us the results," Davis said at the hearing.

Although there has been no similar legislation introduced in the Senate this year, Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., introduced the Information Technology Investment Management Act during the last session of Congress. Carper's bill covered similar ground to Issa's bill. Roger Jordan, VP of federal professional and IT services trade group Professional Services Council, wrote in an op-ed late last month that Carper is "widely expected" to soon reintroduce a version of his bill.

A number of Issa's proposals were met by guarded approval by the former and current government officials and private sector execs assembled as witnesses at Wednesday's hearing. For example, Dan Gordon, the former head of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy and current dean of government procurement law at the George Washington University Law School, said he supported certain elements of Issa's bill, such as efforts to strengthen the federal acquisition workforce and calls for more strategic sourcing.

Issa's bill got no direct endorsement from Department of Homeland CIO Richard Spires, who was also testifying at the hearing, but Spires voiced no real criticisms, either. Spires applauded the Department of Veterans Affairs' model of IT management, which includes a strong centralized CIO and rigorous program management.

Not everyone is likely to buy in to every part of Issa's plan. In testimony before the committee last month, federal CIO Steven VanRoekel said that, in his opinion, additional legislation isn't needed to overhaul federal IT management. However, he conceded in a later interview with InformationWeek that "there potentially is room for legislative motion" in the CIOs' budget authority, although even that would be fraught with concern because of the sometimes bureaucratic way budgets are allocated inside of agencies.

Carper's plan also has numerous distinctions with Issa's bill. It's unclear how or when the House will reconcile its efforts with those that could soon be reintroduced in the Senate, and even the details of Issa's bill remain to be worked out. However, it's clear that Issa is committed to pushing something forward.

"Accomplishing major reform will not be easy," Issa said in a statement. "But streamlining our obsolete approach to federal IT needs to be at the heart of our effort to protect taxpayer dollars from further waste, fraud, abuse and mismanagement."

Attend Interop Las Vegas, May 6-10, and attend the most thorough training on Apple Deployment at the NEW Mac & iOS IT Conference. Use Priority Code DIPR02 by March 2 to save up to $500 off the price of Conference Passes. Join us in Las Vegas for access to 125+ workshops and conference classes, 350+ exhibiting companies, and the latest technology. Register for Interop today!

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Andrew Hornback
Andrew Hornback,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/2/2013 | 4:40:05 AM
re: Federal IT Reform: Are More Laws Needed?
John, giving agency CIOs more authority is a great idea, but until they they more budgetary power, there won't be a whole lot of people listening to them. Until you have control of the checkbook, you don't have authority - that's my experience.

The first and foremost increase in accountability has to be a requirement to review all open IT projects in the federal sector that are 36 months old or older. With the rate at which innovations happen in the IT world, what may have been a good idea 3 years ago may no longer be required. Technology moves fast, federal IT has to take a page from the corporate IT world and be more agile.

Andrew Hornback
InformationWeek Contributor
User Rank: Apprentice
2/28/2013 | 6:46:23 PM
re: Federal IT Reform: Are More Laws Needed?
The bill encourages the use of open source software which should help reduce software costs.
I didn't see any mention of standards such as XML.
John Foley
John Foley,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/28/2013 | 2:46:28 PM
re: Federal IT Reform: Are More Laws Needed?
Federal IT management is moving in the right direction and there are good results to show. I would give a thumbs up to what's being done in data center consolidation, cloud adoption, shared services, mobility, and cybersecurity. And credit where credit it due -- federal IT spending has been flat, even slightly down, over the past four years. But more can and should be done. There are still too many large-scale, poor-performing IT projects, ROI data is lacking, IT acquisition needs improvement, and too many agencies are dependent on outdated legacy systems. I'm not convinced that new laws are the fix. I would start by giving agency CIOs authority, applying more in the way of performance metrics, and increasing accountability.
How GIS Data Can Help Fix Vaccine Distribution
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  2/17/2021
Graph-Based AI Enters the Enterprise Mainstream
James Kobielus, Tech Analyst, Consultant and Author,  2/16/2021
11 Ways DevOps Is Evolving
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  2/18/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
Flash Poll