Put 2008 Presidential Debates On YouTube, Group Appeals - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Infrastructure
News
4/25/2007
05:33 PM
50%
50%

Put 2008 Presidential Debates On YouTube, Group Appeals

An alliance of political groups and technology companies are requesting that the video footage be placed in the public domain, or under a Creative Commons license.

Want to get more young people to vote? Why not upload the Presidential debates YouTube and make it safe to share the video?

That's the request signed on Wednesday by a bi-partisan alliance of 75 people including Craigslist founder Craig Newmark and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales.

The alliance, which is comprised of political groups, technology companies, and individuals, sent the letters to the Republican and Democratic national committees seeking open access to video footage of presidential debate videos. Stanford Law Professor and founder of the Center for Internet and Society, Lawrence Lessig posted the request on his blog (PDF).

The letters request that the video footage be placed in the public domain, or under a Creative Commons license, to protect bloggers and other Internet users from being prosecuted for accessing or re-using the material. Critics suggest that such an open license would cut television networks out of deals for exclusive rights to the footage.

"Technology has exploded the opportunity for people to comment upon and spread political speech," Lessig said in a prepared statement. "I am very hopeful that both the Republicans and the Democrats will help encourage the extraordinary public discussion around the election that the Internet has enabled, by removing any uncertainty about the right of the people to comment upon the speech of presidential candidates."

Mike Krempasky, co-founder of RedState.com, urged the RNC to "do anything and everything to encourage their supporters to get involved." Adam Green of MoveOn Civic Action said people should be able to get candidates' positions free through YouTube and "share them with others without fear of breaking the law."

Michael Turk, former eCampaign Director for the Republican National Committee, said that since the President's job is the most important one, "parties should conduct discussions and debates between candidates in a transparent way."

"Allowing unfettered access to the footage of the debates is a step in that direction," he added.

The appeal for open access to the debates follows other Internet-based changes to the political process. Presidential candidates communicated with voters on the Web directly for the first time in 1996 and were granted permission to accept online contributions for the first time in 2000.

"In 2008, we need to ensure that the promise of online video is not inhibited," the letter explained. "In the past, television stations that broadcast presidential debates have retained exclusive rights to debate footage after the event was over. By and large, such contract terms were not noticed by voters, activists, or news junkies."

Despite the Presidential debates being broadcast on national television, the letter explains that there was no forum for people to share video content then.

"But in the age of online video sharing, corporations retaining exclusive rights to debate footage is an obvious barrier to democratic participation," the letter stated. "No concerned voter should ever be labeled a lawbreaker for wanting to share video of a presidential debate with others."

Proponents of the plan said they want anyone to be able to access, edit, and share with others with proper attribution. They pointed to C-SPAN's decision earlier this year to allow expanded use of their video content.

Other notable supporters of the video licensing rights request include members of both political parties and former U.S. Election Commission Chair Brad Smith; Columbia Law School Professor and founder of the university's program on law and technology, Timothy Wu; Cory Doctorow, of the Annenberg Center for Public Diplomacy at the University of Southern California; veterans' groups, privacy organizations, bloggers, labor groups, and members of the media.

Representatives for the networks could not be reached immediately for comment Wednesday.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Slideshows
10 Ways to Transition Traditional IT Talent to Cloud Talent
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  11/23/2020
News
What Comes Next for the COVID-19 Computing Consortium
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  11/24/2020
News
Top 10 Data and Analytics Trends for 2021
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  11/13/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
Video
Current Issue
Why Chatbots Are So Popular Right Now
In this IT Trend Report, you will learn more about why chatbots are gaining traction within businesses, particularly while a pandemic is impacting the world.
Slideshows
Flash Poll