Disruptive Education Advocate Encouraged By Obama Focus - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Healthcare // Analytics
12:31 PM
Connect Directly

Disruptive Education Advocate Encouraged By Obama Focus

Christensen Institute's Michael Horn says Obama college ratings proposal could be valuable without link to student financial aid.

10 Cool Back-To-School Tech Tools
10 Cool Back-To-School Tech Tools
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
When President Barack Obama came out with a series of proposals for rating higher education and tying those ratings to student financial aid, these were familiar themes for Michael Horn.

Horn recommended a similar data-driven approach with the quality-value index he proposed in 2010. He doesn't necessarily claim the White House is following his lead, although policy advisors there and at the U.S. Department of Education probably reviewed it and similar proposals.

"I think they looked at our proposal and others for ideas about how to calculate the return on investment and ways to make people make smarter decisions about where to attend, based on productivity and affordability," Horn said.

Horn originally proposed a formula that would include factors such as the rate at which graduates found jobs within 90 or 180 days of graduation, as well as the salaries they commanded. Moving on to another level of higher education would also be recognized as a success metric. To keep the ratings from being entirely financially driven, he also suggested including a student satisfaction rating and other factors recognizing that "economics would not capture everything a college experience is supposed to return."

[ Do blended -- part online, part classroom -- college courses work? Read MOOCs Lead Duke To Reinvent On-Campus Courses. ]

Still, a big part of the point of Horn's proposal -- and Obama's -- is to avoid encouraging students to invest student loan dollars and other financial aid in an education that is unlikely to reward them with the earning power they will need to pay back their loans or deliver an economic benefit to the nation. Obama's proposal talks about measuring outcomes such as "graduation and transfer rates, graduate earnings, and advanced degrees of college graduates."

Obama also talked up online college programs such as the Georgia Institute of Technology master's degree in computer science, which will cost less than $7,000 thanks to a partnership with Udacity (one of the MOOC's most celebrated advances).

How that advocacy will translate into policy remains to be seen, Horn said. "What the president did really well is use the bully pulpit to shine light on new forms of education and give them some legitimacy."

Horn co-authored the book Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns with Harvard Business School Professor Clayton M. Christensen and Curtis W. Johnson. Christensen is best known for the theory of disruptive innovation explained in The Innovator's Dilemma and its sequels, and in recent years he has identified both K-12 and higher education as prime candidates for disruption. As co-founder of the Clayton Christensen Institute, Horn serves as the executive director of its education program and advocates for certain innovations.

Obama has already directed the U.S. Department of Education to develop a system for rating how well an education at different institutions pays off for students, a move that is within his executive power. Horn agrees with the political analysts who say the financial aid portion of Obama's proposals face poor odds of passing Congress. However, that might not be a bad thing, he said.

"I think it would make a lot of sense to introduce the ratings and not have them tied to financial aid so that first we can see, is this the ratings system we want? You might see a change in behavior just based on the ratings being available without it being tied to financial aid," Horn said.

A two-step approach would also introduce the ratings into the marketplace in a way that was less politically loaded, Horn said. "It could be more like the rankings from U.S. News -- and not the political football that ABC ratings in K-12 have become."

Even if it turns out that a financial impetus is required to propel students toward choices with a better justification, it would make sense to "do some tests with it before implementing it whole hog," he said.

Follow David F. Carr at @davidfcarr or Google+, along with @IWKEducation.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Author
8/30/2013 | 7:29:31 PM
re: Disruptive Education Advocate Encouraged By Obama Focus
I'm all for evidence based tools for deciding investments. But I think while students may have better tools for deciding where to invest their education dollars, the information will fail to help them see the bigger lessons of economics at work. Namely: Colleges' dependence on federal (need we spellout: Taxpayers') dollars, which continues to give colleges the incentive to borrow more, build more, charge more. So while students may have more data to choose school A over B, their overall investment in college is becoming a costly investment with a ever-poorer ROI. Add to that the fact that taxpayers now back $1 trillion in college loans, and it's getting a little scary to see the next great bubble after housing showing up on college campuses.
User Rank: Strategist
8/29/2013 | 3:46:06 PM
re: Disruptive Education Advocate Encouraged By Obama Focus
As a recent grad, I would say that my peers were very aware of the economic implications of their majors, but personality and interests were also factors when it came to selecting a field. Plenty of students who went into business or engineering were interested in their studies, but also chose their majors because of job security. Those who chose less lucrative majors did so with future plans in mind, and put forth greater effort to secure post-grad plans such as jobs, internships, or grad school to get ahead with their degrees.
User Rank: Author
8/29/2013 | 1:37:41 PM
re: Disruptive Education Advocate Encouraged By Obama Focus
It's hard to say. It depends on a number of factors -- the student's personality, interests and maturity among them. It also depends on the student's financial situation and, to some extent, the level of parental involvement in the student's education. It seems to me that college students today are more connected to economic implications than those in my college days (early '80s), given the much higher costs (even adjusted for inflation) and more unstable economy.
David F. Carr
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
8/28/2013 | 8:50:54 PM
re: Disruptive Education Advocate Encouraged By Obama Focus
Do you agree that students are too often disconnected from the economic implications of the school they enroll in or the discipline they choose to study?
CIOs Face Decisions on Remote Work for Post-Pandemic Future
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  2/19/2021
11 Ways DevOps Is Evolving
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  2/18/2021
CRM Trends 2021: How the Pandemic Altered Customer Behavior Forever
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  2/18/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
Flash Poll