Patent Office To Review Legitimacy Of Amazon's One-Click Shopping Patent - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Patent Office To Review Legitimacy Of Amazon's One-Click Shopping Patent

A government examiner agreed evidence provided by a New Zealand actor warrants a re-examination of the patent.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will re-examine's controversial patent on one-click Internet shopping.

A New Zealand actor, Peter Calveley, filed an application in February and paid a $2,545 fee to start a years-long process that could lead to the revocation of the patent.

In granting the review last week, examiner Matthew Graham says Calveley's application "raises a substantial new question of the patentability of the claims" made to get the patent.

Amazon won the patent in 1999 for a business process that lets shoppers buy merchandise without having to enter their billing and shipping information every time they made a purchase on the Web site.

Calveley's re-examination application cites a 1998 patent that mentions a single action to order an item. The citation could be prior art that could show the Amazon innovation wasn't new. Patents are granted only for new and nonobvious innovations.

Calveley appeared in the Lord of the Rings films. His movements were digitally recorded, then used as the basis for one of the animated characters.

This is the latest of a long line of IT-related patent re-examinations. The Patent Office is reviewing patents issued to NTP for its wireless E-mail technology. Earlier this year, BlackBerry provider Research In Motion paid $612.5 million to NTP, the holder of wireless E-mail patents that are in the process of being invalidated by the government. Similarly, the Patent Office has made a preliminary ruling to invalidate the patent of MercExchange for a business process it says online auctioneer eBay uses for its Buy-It-Now feature. Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court in eBay v. MercExchange ruled that federal trial judges shouldn't automatically impose injunctions against patent infringers.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
Time to Shift Your Job Search Out of Neutral
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  3/31/2021
Does Identity Hinder Hybrid-Cloud and Multi-Cloud Adoption?
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  4/1/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Flash Poll