Should Windows Phone, Windows RT Licenses Be Free? - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile // Mobile Devices
04:09 PM
Connect Directly

Should Windows Phone, Windows RT Licenses Be Free?

License fees have helped make Microsoft the titan it is today. But is the company preparing to abandon fees for Windows Phone and Windows RT?

 Microsoft Surface: 10 Best And Worst Changes
Microsoft Surface: 10 Best And Worst Changes
(click image for larger view)

Microsoft might waive Windows Phone and Windows RT licenses, according to a new report. With Google's Android available to manufacturers at no cost, Microsoft has had difficulty rallying support for its mobile platforms. Free licenses could help, but the move would also represent a substantial shift in the company's Windows strategy.

Microsoft executive vice president Terry Myerson is seriously considering the maneuver, according to The Verge, which cited sources familiar with the company's plans. Nothing is yet certain, but if Microsoft opts to make Windows RT and Windows Phone licenses free, the move would reportedly coincide with the company's rumored Windows 8.2 "Threshold" release.

Allegedly pegged for spring 2015, Threshold could bring back the Start menu to the desktop and further unify the code base across Microsoft's various platforms. The rumors have played into gossip that Microsoft plans to kill Windows RT, but according to ZDNet, the goal is to provide several different Windows versions that run on top of a common-code foundation, and to eliminate the dissonance that currently exists between Microsoft's traditional mouse-and-keyboard users and its touch-centric new platforms.

[ Social media can be a marketer's best friend or worst enemy. Read more: 10 Worst Social Media Meltdowns Of 2013. ]

Microsoft currently licenses its OSes, but in the case of Windows Phone and Windows RT, manufacturers have shown little interest. Nokia accounts for the vast majority of Windows Phones, which played a major role in Microsoft's decision to purchase the company. Microsoft and Nokia also account for the entire range of Windows RT 8.1 tablets currently on the market: Microsoft's Surface RT and Surface 2, and Nokia's Lumia 2520.

A number of factors have contributed to Microsoft's OEM problems, ranging from consumer indifference toward Windows tablets' Live Tile interface, to high device costs, to a lack of touch apps popular on other platforms. But by exploring free licensing, Microsoft would tacitly acknowledge a different sort of dilemma: Android is free, and unless you have iOS's installed base, free is hard to compete with.

This isn't the first time in recent months that Microsoft has allegedly considered doing away with licensing fees. Reports in October stated Myerson approached HTC about waiving the costs. Other reports from March claimed Microsoft offered OEMs reduced OS and Office licenses in order to stimulate production of Windows 8.1 tablets.

If Microsoft kills licensing fees for some or all of its mobile platforms, the strategy would represent more than a simple appeal to partners, however. It could also signal a shift in the company's revenue streams, away from OS license royalties and toward software and services. Such a move is consistent with outgoing CEO Steve Ballmer's "One Microsoft" vision, which envisions assets such as Office, Bing, Skype, and SkyDrive moving from device to device with the user. But it would also be an aggressive departure from the strategies that have made the company as large and influential as it is today.

The possibility provides further context to Wednesday's news that Nokia has been working on a forked Android smartphone. Such a product seems incompatible with Nokia's imminent absorption into Microsoft, but Microsoft might still be game because the device could funnel users toward services such as Skype and SkyDrive. At the same time, because the smartphone will allegedly run a forked OS in the vein of Amazon's Android-derived Kindle tablets, it won't feed into the mainstream Android ecosystem, meaning Microsoft could avoid inadvertently promoting archrival Google.

Still, as InformationWeek's Eric Zeman pointed out, a Microsoft-supported Android device, even a forked one, would distract developers from creating Windows Phone apps. Nonetheless, it's becoming clear that Microsoft knows that it's playing from behind in the mobile space, and that its current game plan might not be enough to challenge Apple or Google. Anything could still change as the company continues to interview candidates to replace Ballmer, but after relying for years on successful Windows revenue model, the company appears primed for new strategies.

Cloud Connect Summit, March 31 – April 1, 2014, offers a two-day program colocated at Interop Las Vegas developed around "10 critical cloud decisions." Cloud Connect Summit zeros in on the most pressing cloud technology, policy and organizational decisions & debates for the cloud-enabled enterprise. Cloud Connect Summit is geared towards a cross-section of disciplines with a stake in the cloud-enabled enterprise. Register for Cloud Connect Summit today.

Michael Endler joined InformationWeek as an associate editor in 2012. Michael graduated from Stanford in 2005 and previously worked in talent representation, as a freelance copywriter and photojournalist, and as a teacher.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Strategist
12/12/2013 | 12:20:40 PM
InformationWeek cover 2009: Why Windows Must Go Open Source
Perhaps Exec. VP Myerson Terry Myerson was reading InformationWeek in early 2009 when it predicted Microsoft would be pressed to invoke this option in a cover story, "Why Windows Must Go Open Source." The

It would have been a good move then. Now it may be too late.
User Rank: Ninja
12/12/2013 | 8:53:28 AM
Will that help?
I'm not seeing where the licensing fees are pricing the Windows phones and tablets out of the market.  Is the plan that manufacturers will have larger profit margins than they currently have on Windows phones?  This seems like a solution to a problem that not many people are complaining about.  I'm sure the manufacturers would appreciate it but is anyone clamoring for it?  Will a new batch of manufacturers start making Windows phones just because there is no licensing fee?  I guess I don't see that happening since they are doing just fine with Android and why would they shift their attention.  Microsoft needs more than a couple new phone models to catch up to iOS and Android.
David F. Carr
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
12/11/2013 | 4:55:23 PM
Will Microsoft swallow its pride?
I'd say the main thing holding them back is the necessity of admitting they were wrong with past strategies.
Think Like a Chief Innovation Officer and Get Work Done
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  10/13/2020
10 Trends Accelerating Edge Computing
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  10/8/2020
Northwestern Mutual CIO: Riding Out the Pandemic
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  10/7/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
[Special Report] Edge Computing: An IT Platform for the New Enterprise
Edge computing is poised to make a major splash within the next generation of corporate IT architectures. Here's what you need to know!
Flash Poll