RIAA Setback: Making Music Available May Not Be Copyright Infringement - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile // Mobile Devices
04:31 PM
Connect Directly

RIAA Setback: Making Music Available May Not Be Copyright Infringement

A district judge may order a new trial in a music file-sharing suit that won record companies $222,000 for copyright infringement.

The act of making music available online may not be a copyright violation after all. And if that's the case, Jammie Thomas of Minnesota may not have to pay the $222,000 judgment won by record companies last year, an amount Thomas' attorneys argue is unconstitutionally excessive.

In his blog on Thursday, Google senior copyright counsel William Patry wrote, "Today, district judge Michael Davis issued an order indicating he may order a new trial based on an entirely different ground: concern that Jury Instruction N. 15, which permitted the jury to find infringement based on the RIAA's making available theory, may be contrary to the Eighth Circuit's binding precedent in National Car Rental System, Inc. v. Computer Associates, Inc., requiring the distribution of actual copies."

At the conclusion of Thomas' trial, jurors were presented with, among others, Instruction N. 15: "The act of making copyrighted sound recordings available for electronic distribution on a peer-to-peer network, without license from the copyright owners, violates the copyright owners' exclusive right of distribution, regardless of whether actual distribution has been shown."

According to a Star Tribune report, the judge's order said that "he may have made a 'manifest error of law' last October when he instructed a Duluth jury that simply uploading songs to a music file-sharing network could be considered illegal distribution, even in the absence of proof that anyone received them."

Patry, a respected copyright expert, said he believes the making available theory is inconsistent with the ruling in the National Car Rental case and observed that the judge had taken note of the decision in Atlantic v. Howell, in which a decision that had initially equated making a file available with file distribution was reversed.

If the judge does decide to order a retrial, a higher burden of proof in future lawsuits may be necessary to establish a violation of copyright law by users of peer-to-peer file-sharing services.

According to Patry, the judge has scheduled a briefing on the issue for May 29 at noon, with reply briefs due at noon on June 5, and oral argument on July 1.

Said Patry, "This is a big deal."

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Becoming a Self-Taught Cybersecurity Pro
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  6/9/2021
Ancestry's DevOps Strategy to Control Its CI/CD Pipeline
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  6/4/2021
IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Flash Poll