Apple Watch Battery Life: Will It Be Enough? - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
1/23/2015
12:06 PM
50%
50%

Apple Watch Battery Life: Will It Be Enough?

The Apple Watch is expected to offer several hours of active use and 19 hours overall. However, in the new wearable market, is it enough?

Wearables At Work: 7 Productivity Apps
Wearables At Work: 7 Productivity Apps
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Apple has already told us how long the Apple Watch battery will last. CEO Tim Cook implied it will need to be charged daily. A new report this week says Apple is targeting 2.5 to 4 hours of active use and about 19 hours of mixed use -- more or less confirming Cook's claims. Considering what other smartwatches in the market deliver with respect to battery life, the Apple Watch is nothing to worry about.

Apple picked a fairly powerful processor and a high-quality screen for the Apple Watch, reports 9to5mac, which lead to significant power consumption. The S1 chip inside the Apple Watch mirrors the performance of its A5 processor. The LCD is pixel-rich and refreshes at 60 frames per second.

In addition to the 2.5 to 4 hours of active use, Apple was shooting for about three days of standby time and four days in sleeping mode. Sources with direct knowledge of the matter told 9to5mac that Apple will probably only be able to deliver two or three days of standby or low-power time. Moreover, the first-generation device may not reach the hoped-for 19 hours of mixed use.

[Take a look at Wearables In 2015: 4 Predictions.]

The company is testing the device's battery life heavily. It has seeded about 3,000 units to people who've been directed to use a mix of stock and third-party apps to stress the battery as much as possible. 9to5mac claims battery life concerns are what led Apple to push the watch's debut from late 2014 to early 2015.

Last fall CEO Tim Cook said, "We think people are going to use it so much, you'll end up charging it daily." Most Android Wear devices I've used need to be charged daily. I've tested the Sony Smart Watch 3, the Motorola Moto 360, and the LG G Watch R. All three devices provide about one day (7 a.m. to 11 p.m.) of mixed use. Only the Sony Smart Watch 3 delivered better than one day of battery life. Android Wear devices can count steps, track your heart rate, offer notifications for incoming calls/messages, push calendar alerts, and even play music. The Apple Watch will be able to do all these things and more.

Apple's battery-life targets sound about right. It's hard to imagine spending 2.5 to 4 hours a day staring at your wrist. This is why we have smartphones. The Apple Watch is an accessory for the iPhone. Sure, it does plenty of things on its own, but most of its power comes from a nearby smartphone. The biggest concern may be the suggestion that first-generation devices may not reach 19 hours of mixed use. Apple will have to get it to at least 16 or 17 hours. Even then, it will be about on par with competing smartwatches.

The Apple Watch is expected by the end of March. Prices start at $349 and go up depending on which variant of the device you choose.

Get the latest information to migrate your systems, services, and applications to the next level at Enterprise Connect. Cisco, Microsoft, Avaya, and Oracle will lead the keynote lineup, and thought leaders from enterprises and vendors will cover the full range of platforms, services, and applications that will simplify your migration to next-gen communications and collaboration systems. Register for Enterprise Connect with code DIWKWEB to save $100 off the early-bird rate. It happens in Orlando, Fla., March 16 to 19.

Eric is a freelance writer for InformationWeek specializing in mobile technologies. View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
PedroGonzales
50%
50%
PedroGonzales,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2015 | 10:22:32 AM
Re: apple watch battery life in question
Good point. Being an early consumer may not  be a good idea then.  It would make sense to wait a couple of years when they have resolve most of the most annoying bugs.  I friend of mind got a Samsung smartwatch it is pretty cool.  The problem was that we got lost trying to find a coffee shop because he got distracted texting via voice on the watch. 
Kelly22
50%
50%
Kelly22,
User Rank: Strategist
1/27/2015 | 10:21:05 AM
Re: apple watch battery life in question
Right, we're still seeing the growth of smartphones and experimenting with how much they're capable of. Until the smartphone starts to get "old" there's really no great need for a new accessory like the smartwatch. I appreciate the effort towards innovation, but not sure that particular device is something we really need right now.
nomii
50%
50%
nomii,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2015 | 6:52:27 AM
Re: apple watch battery life in question
You are right Kelly and I don't think are at a stage where we can consider smart watch as a replacement of smartphone. Smartphone itself is in evolution phase and hasn't reached its maturity in terms of innovation. Once that level is achieved and smartphones new models becomes redundant than people will start finding something new.
nomii
50%
50%
nomii,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2015 | 6:45:12 AM
Re: apple watch battery life in question
@PedroGonzales: smart watch is still at its initial phase so an average battery would solve the purpose but soon developers will jump in and start developing apps than not only the requirement of multitasking will arose but better battery life will also be user's primary concern.
Kelly22
50%
50%
Kelly22,
User Rank: Strategist
1/26/2015 | 5:02:19 PM
Re: apple watch battery life in question
I don't either, to be honest. It's tough to think of something a smartwatch can do that a smartphone can't. Actually, I know a few people who wear a "dumb watch" as an accessory but still check the time on their phone.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
1/26/2015 | 4:07:39 PM
Re: apple watch battery life in question
>I'm better off with a dumb watch. 

Or none at all. I just don't get the need for the Apple Watch.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Author
1/25/2015 | 7:34:35 PM
Better to get a new watch!
In the old days, if your battery ran out on your "dumb watch," you could either 1) pay $10-20 for a new watch battery, or 2) just get a new watch.  Maybe I'm a bit of a Luddite, but it's hard for me to imagine anyone but the most devoted/deranged tech geeks and Apple fans standing for charging their watch -- among their many other devices.
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
1/23/2015 | 7:59:59 PM
Bluetooth, a chatty protocol
The LG watch that Google aired at Google i/O was designed for some short, casual uses, such as glancing at email updates. But the problem was it used a Bluetooth connection to the phone, and Bluetooth is a very chatty protocol, transmitting queries: Are you there? Yes, I'm here. Do you have anything for me? No, I don't. OK, I'll call again. Yes, call again soon." Even when you, the wearer, aren't doing much, Bluetooth is constantly checking in and checking up on you. There goes the battery.
Stratustician
50%
50%
Stratustician,
User Rank: Ninja
1/23/2015 | 3:15:32 PM
Re: apple watch battery life in question
I agree.  That being said, there are several other wearables on the market geared towards low-use folks who really just want the watch to send them alerts.  For example, I picked up a first gen Pebble on kickstarter and I get several days life out of it due to the low usage.  I think the more features vendors load onto the watches and the more users use the watch-based apps, it's going to be very hard to maximize the battery time.  It's really up to users to decide whether they can live with more functionality and sacrifice battery life for it, or if they are going to get more use out of something that is more limited but has the basic functionality they are looking for that gives them better battery life.
PedroGonzales
50%
50%
PedroGonzales,
User Rank: Ninja
1/23/2015 | 12:48:44 PM
apple watch battery life in question
I think the article raises an important point.  Does the apple watch really needs a long battery life?  I would think such battery life will be more suited for an Smartphone than the watch.  If people are using it on a regular basis and have a lot of apps running on it.  The battery life won't be enough.  I'm better off with a dumb watch.   
Slideshows
Reflections on Tech in 2019
James M. Connolly, Editorial Director, InformationWeek and Network Computing,  12/9/2019
Slideshows
What Digital Transformation Is (And Isn't)
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/4/2019
Commentary
Watch Out for New Barriers to Faster Software Development
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  12/3/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll