Samsung Loses In Home Court To Apple - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile // Mobile Business
11:00 AM

Samsung Loses In Home Court To Apple

Apple cleared by South Korea court of infringing on Samsung smartphone patents.

Android Security: 8 Signs Hackers Own Your Smartphone
Android Security: 8 Signs Hackers Own Your Smartphone
(click image for larger view)

Samsung suffered a loss in its home country of South Korea Thursday, where a judge cleared Apple of infringing on three different smartphone patents held by Samsung. Apple can continue to sell its iPhones in South Korea without facing a ban.

Samsung accused Apple of violating patents related to messaging in mobile devices. It named the iPhone 4S and iPhone 5 as the violators and wanted sales of the phones banned in South Korea, plus about $100,000 in damages. The court rejected all of Samsung's claims, saying the company's patents were invalid because they could easily be replicated using other technologies.

"We are disappointed by the court's decision," Samsung said in a statement. "We will continue to take the measures necessary to protect our intellectual property rights."

This trial is different from one that Apple lost to Samsung in South Korea last year. That patent spat involved standard essential patents. Apple was found guilty of infringing on Samsung's standard essential patents, but there's a big if attached to that verdict: Standard essential patents must be licensed at fair and reasonable terms. That means Samsung can't stick Apple with a huge bill to license them, and it couldn't be awarded massive damages.

Both companies continue to do battle in the US and beyond.

[Learn more about the legal wrangling over smartphone patents. See Apple-Samsung Trial: Millions At Stake.]

In November, a California jury determined that Samsung owes Apple $290 million in damages for violating its smartphone patents. The original judgment (made in August 2012) called for $1.05 billion in damages, but the judge overseeing the case tossed more than $400 million of the award because the jury calculated the damages incorrectly.

In that case, 26 Samsung devices were found guilty of infringing on Apple's patents. The judge upheld $600 million in damages, which applied to 13 of the devices. A new jury was picked to recalculate the amount owed for the remaining 13 devices. The jury came back with an award for Apple of $290 million, less than the $380 million Apple wanted, but far more than the $52 million Samsung believed it owed.

Samsung now owes Apple $890 million in damages for violating its smartphone patents.

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 smartphone and Galaxy Gear smartwatch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 smartphone and Galaxy Gear smartwatch.

Apple and Samsung have been battling one another for several years in courtrooms around the world, including the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia. Each has won some rulings and lost others. The companies are primed to renew their head-to-head battle in March 2014 when the second major US trial between the two begins. That trial applies to newer devices made by Samsung, and could have a larger impact on the company if either a ban or more damages are awarded to Apple.

Despite Apple's recent victories, Samsung's smartphones outsell Apple's by a wide margin. Samsung shipped more than twice as many smartphones during the last quarter, and it aims to take down Apple's tablet lead as soon as next year.

Eric Zeman is a freelance writer for InformationWeek specializing in mobile technologies.

InformationWeek 500 companies take a practical view of even trendy tech such as cloud, big data analytics and mobile. Read all about what they're doing in our big new special issue. Also in the InformationWeek 500 issue: A ranking of our top 250 winners, profiles of the top five companies, and 20 great ideas that you can steal. (Free registration required.)

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
12/12/2013 | 11:51:53 AM
Patent law
I'm no legal expert, but it really seems like something needs to be done about current patent law, as it's just creating these legal quagmires where companies can use anti-competitive practices without getting caught out. 

The lack of competition it breeds will make the situation worse for the consumer in the end. 
Think Like a Chief Innovation Officer and Get Work Done
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  10/13/2020
10 Trends Accelerating Edge Computing
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  10/8/2020
Northwestern Mutual CIO: Riding Out the Pandemic
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  10/7/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
[Special Report] Edge Computing: An IT Platform for the New Enterprise
Edge computing is poised to make a major splash within the next generation of corporate IT architectures. Here's what you need to know!
Flash Poll