Apple Watch Misnomer: Wireless Charging - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile // Mobile Business
01:10 PM
Jessica Lipsky
Jessica Lipsky

Apple Watch Misnomer: Wireless Charging

I thought Apple would surely announce phones or a wearable capable of magnetic resonance charging -- and I was sorely disappointed.

The Apple Watch is pretty cool, guys. Forget the variety of form factors, enhanced fitness monitor capabilities, customizable bands, digital crown control, and integrated Apple Pay. It has wireless charging. Kind of.

The grand debutante ball for Apple's iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus also featured the company's entrance into the smartwatch market with great results. The Cult of Apple will likely be the kick in the pants (wrist?) that the smartwatch market needs to take off, but this device's charging method does little to advance the wireless charging standards battle. In fact, Apple's live event Tuesday placed wireless charging as an afterthought.

I’ve written before about the need for a major player to drive the ubiquity of wireless charging in the mobile sphere. Following weeks of speculation, I thought Apple would surely announce phones or a wearable capable of magnetic resonance charging -- my bet for the winner among the coil-based charging methods -- and I was sorely disappointed. Not only were the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus completely devoid of wireless charging, but Apple chose the less mobile close-coupled magnetic inductive charger for its watch. Why Apple, why?

Read the rest of this story on EE Times.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Strategist
9/10/2014 | 6:25:25 PM
Re: What?
How long will it take to charge?  I could see people wanting use the watch like a FitBit to track sleep at night.
User Rank: Ninja
9/10/2014 | 4:02:13 PM
Because magnetic resonance is inefficient. Why would anyone want that? Secondly, while a watch is too small to allow for a charging port, a phone is not. It's no more difficult to plug your phone in than it is to put it on a charging stand. Honestly, I don't get the big deal here. The most efficient charging, and the fastest, is still obtained by plugging it in. What is the big deal?
The Best Way to Get Started with Data Analytics
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  7/8/2020
10 Cyberattacks on the Rise During the Pandemic
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  6/24/2020
IT Trade Shows Go Virtual: Your 2020 List of Events
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  5/29/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Key to Cloud Success: The Right Management
This IT Trend highlights some of the steps IT teams can take to keep their cloud environments running in a safe, efficient manner.
Flash Poll