AOL Adds 'Native' Mobile Ads - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile // Mobile Business
09:26 AM
Connect Directly

AOL Adds 'Native' Mobile Ads

AOL Platforms aims to give advertisers better results, but some critics object to the editorial-like appearance of native ads.

AOL Platforms on Thursday plans to introduce a new "native" mobile ad unit that will offer marketers a way to promote the installation of apps on mobile devices.

"Native" in advertising parlance means "camouflaged." Native ads resemble editorial content, though they tend to include a label like "Sponsored." The idea is that ads that don't look like ads perform better than obvious pitches.

Chad Gallagher, director of mobile at AOL Platforms, said in a phone interview that native ads do just that. While AOL's native mobile ads prompt viewers to click about as often as traditional banner ads, post-click-through engagement is about six times higher than a display banner, he said.

That's particularly important when trying to encourage someone who clicked on an ad to then click again to initiate the download of an app. AOL says its new native ad unit reaches 86 million users per month through its various websites and through third-party publishing partners.

[Samsung's most known as a hardware maker, but sees software as the better way to compete. See Samsung's Next Frontier: Apps.]

"When something matches the look and feel and design and placement of the content people are consuming, I think they respond much better to it," said Gallagher. "It feels like it's a part of the experience."

Native ads mean different things to different people, said Gallagher. "What we're doing is allowing publishers to create an ad unit that mimics the look of their actual site."

Two decades ago, when publishing industry profits had only begun to come under pressure from the Internet, it was still common to distinguish between ads and editorial. Today, the distinction is far less clear, if it exists at all.

According to a survey conducted last summer by the Online Publisher's Association, 90% of US publishers either already offer native advertising options or plan to do so this year. The practice has become commonplace enough to concern the Federal Trade Commission.

"By presenting ads that resemble editorial content, an advertiser risks implying deceptively that the information comes from a non-biased source," said FTC commissioner Edith Ramirez at a workshop on native advertising held in December.

The FTC has urged search engines to ensure that customers can distinguish between organic and paid search content. It could insist that publishers make the distinction between ads and editorial more obvious as well.

In the meantime, the mobile-driven advertising renaissance can be expected to continue. In February, Yahoo introduced Yahoo Gemini, a marketplace for mobile search ads and native ads. Twitter last week rolled out a new ad unit to drive the installation of mobile apps. Google this week updated its AdWords service with improvements to its app promotion ads, among other additions. Facebook is expected to roll out a mobile app network next week at its F8 developer conference, a network likely to build upon the data accessible through its Parse backend service. The world is going mobile and the advertising industry wants to be there.

Gallagher said that many websites still use traditional rectangular banner ads, despite the emergence of better alternatives.

"I think the opportunity to create better advertising, re-envisioned for where the medium is going, is just completely untouched," he said. "There's a massive opportunity here to do a better job."

There's also potential risk. As Bob Garfield, co-host of NPR's On The Media, put it at the FTC's workshop, "The greatest threat of native advertising is not the deception of consumers and not the unmet needs of brands; the gravest threat is to the media themselves. With every transaction, publishers are mining and exporting that rarest of rare resources, trust."

But by the mathematics that allow us add "advertising" to "editorial" and get "content," we should be able to concoct a palatable substitute for trust. Let's call it "social."

Too many companies treat digital and mobile strategies as pet projects. Here are four ideas to shake up your company. Also in the Digital Disruption issue of InformationWeek: Six enduring truths about selecting enterprise software. (Free registration required.)

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
5/9/2014 | 3:31:02 PM
AOL is not dead yet
I've always hated the subtle and no so subtle jabs at AOL in the last few years. This is stll an excellent company that has managed to remain relevant. And it's great to see them wisely follow Yahoo. Airpush, Twitter and the whole gang of early native mobile advertising adopters. This should help breathe new life into their ad revenue models.
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2014 | 10:18:23 AM
They seem to be doing a good job on advertising the native mobile ad unit that will offer marketers a way to promote the installation of apps on mobile devices. This will create a good platform for the marketers to be able to relate well with their sellers. Itís a plus since it reaches up to 56million users per month through its various websites and through its third party publishing partners. This will prevent biasness of sources since it presents ads that resemble editorial content.
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
4/25/2014 | 2:54:59 PM
AOL bought in 2004 so they've been in the business for a while.
User Rank: Ninja
4/24/2014 | 10:12:04 PM
Well, it's what every salesperson strives for - to not be conceived of as a salesperson, even though we get paid on a straight commission basis. I'm actually surprised it took the ad industry so long to come around. The other noteworthy thing about this is that it creates more work for writers, because every ad has to be rewritten for each publication it runs on.
User Rank: Ninja
4/24/2014 | 6:41:00 PM
I havn't heard anything about AOL in a while. I didn't know they were still around. Now they are in advertising I see. Finding more ways to advertise when it doesn't look like advertising. wondeful.
Top 10 Data and Analytics Trends for 2021
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  11/13/2020
Where Cloud Spending Might Grow in 2021 and Post-Pandemic
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  11/19/2020
The Ever-Expanding List of C-Level Technology Positions
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  11/10/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Why Chatbots Are So Popular Right Now
In this IT Trend Report, you will learn more about why chatbots are gaining traction within businesses, particularly while a pandemic is impacting the world.
Flash Poll