re: IBM Unites Mainframe, Windows Systems
IBM has been putting PCs inside mainframes since the late 80s and 90s. They were called OSA or open systems adapters. The problem was always cost and licensing. Mainframe licenses are way more expensive and they go on and on. PC or windows licenses don't. The question was always how to monetize it without ruining the business they already had. IBM had he chance to corner windows in the office environment in the late 90s with OS/2 Workspace On Demand, which would have added unlimited remote boot OS/2 instances with control at the "icon level" for businesses using mainframe resources as the platform. A short sighted executive killed it with the stroke of a pen, calling OS/2 and Albatross, never seeing that windows, which ran on OS/2 at the time, would have been next. Too much time around the executive coffee machine or too much hard hairspray causing atrophy to the little mind...Now they want to put windows on the mainframe (again). One thing for sure, having too big a bank account can lead to some very obfuscated decisions. I guess if it's your money and you want to bet on folks who think themselves so elite that their own whims direct large markets, company fate, and other bone headed long term effects, then go ahead, buy in. One thing for sure, if it was so easy, then it probably would have been done before...sounds like old stuff rehashed by a new line of wannabe thinkers with overgrown egos...if you hang around long enough, you'll see it all, a couple of times over...few new inventions exists, just old thoughts shown to a new group of gullible animals...hey, just one voice...
User Rank: Apprentice
11/21/2011 | 4:56:46 AM