Chipmaker Disables Counterfeits With Software Update - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Comments
Chipmaker Disables Counterfeits With Software Update
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Jai Vijayan
50%
50%
Jai Vijayan,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/29/2014 | 9:49:41 AM
FTDI CEO Fred Dart responds
Fred Dart the CEO of FTDI downplayed the allged problems created by the company's decision to brick counterfeit chips and insisted that a majority of its customers were not affected by it at all. Here are his emaled comments in their entirety: Jai Vijayan.

Although in certain parts of the media it has been implied that there was some form of counterfeit detection algorithm in FTDI's latest driver, this was in fact absolutely untrue. There was no mechanism of that description in place and hence no flagging up of a counterfeit device ever occurred. Exactly the same commands were sent to a genuine chip as to a counterfeit chip. Some counterfeit devices simply failed to handle certain commands correctly (again something that's shows their lack of suitability for use in serious electronic system design) and they simply quarantined themselves.

Actually this whole episode has not affected our large or medium customers at all. They haven't been hindered in any way as they source chips either directly from us or via our global distribution partners (such as Farnell and Digi-Key).  Even the vast majority of smaller customers have not been impacted and we have been liaising directly with those who have had concerns, in order to ensure that they have genuine FTDI chips. Our priority has always been to make totally sure that our customer base is not inconvenienced. In Asia in particular sales have been actually boosted as people are coming to us rather than certain other less reliable sources so that they can guarantee they have real FTDI silicon and not fakes. Board level products featuring FTDI ICs from Sparkfun, Elektor and Adafruit, among others, are in no way harmed either.

With regard to critical infrastructure - no FTDI definitely has not had any concerns from clients in this area. For such applications engineers are obviously very careful about the source of the ICs they specify. If they incorporated inferior chips into a design then they would be leaving themselves exposed to the possibility that an operational failure might occur when in-situ. They simply can't afford to put themselves in that position, that's why they deal directly with us or with our distributors.

If you get a genuine FTDI USB chip, as opposed to a counterfeit one, there is complete assurance of its continued operation and long term reliability. The company puts all its products through rigorous testing, with USB-IF, WHQL and ESD protection certification all secured. With counterfeit chips none of this effort or engineering resource has been invested into their manufacture, as a result there is a constant risk of them failing and potentially having serious repercussions for those who sourced them. In addition FTDI USB chips can rely on well tested drivers, firmware and software development tools, plus high response technical support is available to deal with customer queries.

Furthermore, FTDI USB chips employ a hard-wired state machine approach, whereas counterfeit devices will use programmable microcontrollers. This means that they aren't anything like as highly optimised and as a result can't match the performance levels set by FTDI devices.

The threat to the semiconductor industry that counterfeiting poses is growing all the time. It is similar to what the film and music businesses are currently seeing - with DVD and album sales dropping dramatically due to pirate copies and illegal downloads sites. This is likely to have a long term effect on creativity, as the investments that chip manufacturers (just like music labels and Hollywood studios) can make in bringing innovative products to market will be smaller and smaller, since their revenue streams are getting diverted to counterfeiters. The semiconductor companies and their distributors, as well as industry bodies like the SIA, need to address the problem now before it is too late.

FTDI has shown itself to be very proactive in combatting the issue of counterfeiting and will continue to be vigilant. The company is working closely with the US customs on this. It is also attempting to take action in the Chinese law courts to prosecute infringers. The hope is that the seriousness of the problem is now beginning to be realized and everyone in the electronics engineering community will do their best to stamp out counterfeiting, as this will benefit the ongoing progression of technology and encourage future technological advances

Fred Dart, CEO, FTDI
ProfTheory
50%
50%
ProfTheory,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/28/2014 | 6:48:18 PM
Deja vu
Among Amateur Radio operators they have also run into this situation. In there case the manufacturer is Prolific who also makes a USB-serial chip. The chip is used in a programming cable for Chinese radios. You buy the cheap cable you get the knockoff chip. If the driver is updated - through Windows - the cable stops working. They then buy the more expensive cable and it starts working agian.
aws0513
100%
0%
aws0513,
User Rank: Strategist
10/28/2014 | 1:10:55 PM
A fascinating story about a perfect storm of ethics and IP rights
This story is amazing to me.

The idea that a hardware/firmware vendor could brick knock-off copies of the product that are widely in use touches on several several ethical and IP owner rights issues to include the rights of those people relying on those devices for critical operations.

Thanks for the great article.  It raises some very interesting questions.


The State of IT & Cybersecurity Operations 2020
The State of IT & Cybersecurity Operations 2020
Download this report from InformationWeek, in partnership with Dark Reading, to learn more about how today's IT operations teams work with cybersecurity operations, what technologies they are using, and how they communicate and share responsibility--or create risk by failing to do so. Get it now!
Commentary
Gartner Forecast Sees 7.3% Shrinkage in IT Spending for 2020
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/15/2020
Slideshows
10 Ways AI Is Transforming Enterprise Software
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  7/13/2020
Commentary
IT Career Paths You May Not Have Considered
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/30/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Key to Cloud Success: The Right Management
This IT Trend highlights some of the steps IT teams can take to keep their cloud environments running in a safe, efficient manner.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll