FTC: Data Brokers Know You Better Than Mom Does - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

FTC: Data Brokers Know You Better Than Mom Does
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
6/9/2014 | 3:51:50 AM
Let's have a Bronx cheer for the DMA
Asking one of the talking heads from the DMA about protecting consumer privacy is like consulting with a fox as to henhouse security.  It is pointless and a profound waste of time.  OF COURSE the DMA will say that *any* notice to consumers as to how their data is collected/used/bought/sold will "impede" (zod forbid) the flow of data!  The FTC may make a whole lotta noise using trendy buzzwords such as "transparency" but unless and until data collection/sharing become opt in rather than opt out, identity theft/data breach will continue to occur. 
Charlie Babcock
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
5/28/2014 | 7:01:44 PM
Consumers should be able to choose privacy
Consumers should own their own data, with a right to keep it private. Instead, big Web companies set themselves up allegedly in service to consumers and in reality collecting information that can be monetized from individuals using their services. Choosing how much of your information to make public and how much to keep private is precisely the service that is not available today.
User Rank: Moderator
5/28/2014 | 11:22:30 AM
Nobody Talks About How Flawed the Data Is...
Data Selling is an epidemic in the US, it is like having cash burning a hole in your pocket anymore.  What gets me is how naive everyone is or they just don't want to talk about the accuracy of the data that is requeried and sold.  It's getting worse out there too and banks, companies, data brokers, etc. have the perfect situation as they can roll and make money on as much flawed data as they want and we are the "free" labor to fix it when there are errors...we get are the ones who get screwed. 

Just yesterday I was talking about getting emails now for Dr. Duck, and I'm not a doctor but I have been sold and requeried and attached to meta data from my blog that would allude to that fact so now I get unsolicited emails for Dr. Duck.  Check out the World Privacy Report and they address this pretty well on how it works and the dangers for consumers...


I just can't believe how "stupid" everyone is out there with beleieving what they find and I have another problem with being listed with two aliases they say I have used.  Fact of the matter, I have never used an alias in my life.  It' total garbage for a lot of it.  Stupid employers use it with their junk science and treat such information like it's the gospel.  Quants have been talking about "virtual" worlds and values since 2004 as they know, they build them.  General public sure is bliss with all of this I have to say. 

Look at Google in suspending my Google Plus account for no other reason than the fact that my real name that works everywhere else in the world was not "machine compliant" by the use of their machine learning algorithms.  Did I get an email..nope..machine learning just cut me off and and oh gee if employers were looking at that..there's a "bad" person lurking there as "what did she do" to have Google suspend here..nothing as their dumb algorithm basically said I was a real duck as their machines had not learned enough. 


Last year I received my new car insurance policy.  Well again my car insurance company with their programmed algorithms assumed I was not giving them complete information and added two new secondary drivers to my policy.  Well again I've never had secondary drivers ever on my policy but I did sell a house about 9 months prior to this and guess what, the couple that bought my house 9 months prior were the "new secondary drivers" that my car insurance company added...see what I mean...

FTC is pretty useless as you need an index to find out who ALL the data sellers are as it goes beyond the brokers by all means.  Again we have digital illiterates trying to create policy with no data mechanics logic.  I have been saying this for 3 years and write to the FTC on this topic.  You need an index to regulate a group and we don't have that so until that is done, it all will fail as people just code around verbiage all the time..look at the banks, master of it.  Steve Kroft at 60 Minutes too just scratches his head on this as they put it out there and consumers in oblivion just suck it up. 


Take in some videos from folks smarter than me, Quants that tell you how this works, they have been talking about this issue since 2004...time to learn up.  Subprime could not have happened without it.

User Rank: Ninja
5/28/2014 | 10:51:18 AM
Right to view data and usage
I think one of the biggest issues with the collection and inevitable transmission between companies as it relates to personal data is that the public has no option to review the data for accuracy.  As more companies start to pull data from these brokers, especially in the medical industry, it will have significant impact on how customers are profiled.  For example, if a customer of an insurance company is suddenly profiled as having a life-threatening disease, regardless if it has been diagnosed or not, it might significantly alter their premiums.  What control would a customer then have to argue that the data was taken out of context and does not apply to them?  Prior, it was the actual medical offices which would deal with the transmission of information between the insurance provider and healthcare provider, but the risk of data brokers in the future having the ability to provide out-of-context data might impact the rights of the customer themself.

2020 State of DevOps Report
2020 State of DevOps Report
Download this report today to learn more about the key tools and technologies being utilized, and how organizations deal with the cultural and process changes that DevOps brings. The report also examines the barriers organizations face, as well as the rewards from DevOps including faster application delivery, higher quality products, and quicker recovery from errors in production.
10 Top Cloud Computing Startups
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  8/3/2020
Adding Fuel to the MSP vs. In-house IT Debate
Andrew Froehlich, President & Lead Network Architect, West Gate Networks,  8/6/2020
How Enterprises Can Adopt Video Game Cloud Strategy
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/28/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Enterprise Automation: Do More with Less
In this IT Trend Report, we highlight the benefits of automation and the various tools as enterprises navigate turbulent times, try to do more with less, keep their operations running, and stay on track with digital modernizations.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll