FCC 'Open' Internet May Mean 'Paid' - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Comments
FCC 'Open' Internet May Mean 'Paid'
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Brian.Dean
50%
50%
Brian.Dean,
User Rank: Ninja
5/15/2014 | 8:49:43 PM
Re: Mozilla's compromise
If less than 10 internet companies are currently accounting for 80% of internet's traffic, then shouldn't the internet to open to monetization, because I feel that these 10 or so companies do not represent 80% of the value that the internet creates. Opening it up to monetization should (at least in theory) make them pay for 80% of the internet.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
5/15/2014 | 5:51:30 PM
Re: "Open Internet"??
There's a lot of that going around. Mozilla, which says its mission is to defend the "open Internet," has just agreed to support DRM in Firefox. I would humbly suggest that anyone using the word "open" be required to write it thus: "open(*)"
GlenW218
50%
50%
GlenW218,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/15/2014 | 5:08:40 PM
Re: Mozilla's compromise
I like Mozilla Proposal, it is what I'm been arguing for weeks.  A lot of people disagree with me.  It makes sense when less than 10 internet companies make up more than 80% of the internet traffic.
anon1471712903
100%
0%
anon1471712903,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/15/2014 | 4:59:24 PM
"Open Internet"??
Don't you just love how government names things?  That way they can get all the support they need from lazy thinkers who just read the title.  "Open Internet?   Oh sure, I'm for that.   Everybody should be for an open internet."

 

I can assure you that when you appoint a cable lobbiest head of the FCC that the end result will be anything *BUT* and open internet.
CMyers
50%
50%
CMyers,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/15/2014 | 4:57:48 PM
Re: Mozilla's compromise
That would probably work, because traffic on the downstream-to-consumer side can be disguised with a VPN if it starts getting throttled.  If they're allowed to manipulate the upstream-to-network side, they will shut down any services that get popular enough to make a dent in the bandwidth, with tolls precisely calculated to make them uncompetitive.
Laurianne
100%
0%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
5/15/2014 | 4:26:17 PM
Mozilla's compromise
What do you think of Mozilla's proposal, readers? A smart step or not enough?
<<   <   Page 2 / 2


2020 State of DevOps Report
2020 State of DevOps Report
Download this report today to learn more about the key tools and technologies being utilized, and how organizations deal with the cultural and process changes that DevOps brings. The report also examines the barriers organizations face, as well as the rewards from DevOps including faster application delivery, higher quality products, and quicker recovery from errors in production.
Slideshows
10 Top Cloud Computing Startups
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  8/3/2020
Commentary
How Enterprises Can Adopt Video Game Cloud Strategy
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/28/2020
Commentary
Conversational AI Comes of Age
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  8/7/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Special Report: Why Performance Testing is Crucial Today
This special report will help enterprises determine what they should expect from performance testing solutions and how to put them to work most efficiently. Get it today!
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll