Uber Ruling Could Cripple Sharing Economy - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
IT Life
News
6/17/2015
08:06 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Uber Ruling Could Cripple Sharing Economy

A foolish decision by the California Labor Commission represents a startling change in the way we view the sharing economy.

Apple's Spaceship, Amazon's Bubble: 10 Hip Tech Headquarters
Apple's Spaceship, Amazon's Bubble: 10 Hip Tech Headquarters
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

The California Labor Commission ruled that Uber drivers are employees, proving that the agency knows nothing at all about technology. If this ruling becomes the standard government reaction to companies that engage in the sharing economy, there will be no sharing economy of which to speak.

At the heart of the ruling is the fact that Uber has standards for its contractors. It requires a certain quality of vehicle, maintenance, and basic courtesy. An Uber "employee," Barbara Berwick, filed a complaint with the commission saying that Uber owed her reimbursable expenses she incurred while working for Uber. These expenses included routine maintenance on her vehicle, which is not owned by Uber.

Berwick said in the filing, "Defendants [Uber] hold themselves out as nothing more than a neutral technological platform, designed simply to enable drivers and passengers to transact the business of transportation," she said. "The reality, however, is that Defendants are involved in every aspect of the operation."

Basically, the ruling is saying that, because Uber doesn't want you to show up in a rusting hulk that might break down on the way to airport, you are an employee.

(Image: Jason Tester Guirrella Future via Flickr)

(Image: Jason Tester Guirrella Future via Flickr)

And basically, the commission is saying that if I rent my house for a weekend on AirBnB, that makes me an employe of AirBnB .

Granted, the commission is quick to point out the ruling only applies to Berwick and isn't "policy." But you can bet every Uber driver will be gathering Jiffy Lube receipts at this point and filing a similar claim. You can also bet that courts and other labor commissions will be looking at cases like this.

Here's the thing. If Uber drivers are "employees," one can make the argument they are owed benefits, insurance, and all other things that usually apply to a full-time employee. If everyone who is a major participant in the sharing economy is considered an "employee," the business model simply doesn't work.

[ And the sharing economy is supposed to grow to $335 Billion by 2025. Read The Sharing Economy: Access Is The New Ownership . ]

You can decide individually whether you care about such a thing. Uber, specifically, has often been criticized over the safety of its drivers and passengers. AirBnB has had issues with theft and damages. Maybe the sharing economy is a bad idea.

Whatever you think of the sharing economy, it seems strange that someone making their own hours, using their own equipment, on their own time, making money when they choose, is considered an employee simply because they need to meet a certain minimum standard of service. If that's what an employee is, then I plan to show up at work tomorrow whenever I feel like it, write an article whenever I get around to it, and then ask for InformationWeek to reimburse me for the use of my household electricity since I work from home.

David has been writing on business and technology for over 10 years and was most recently Managing Editor at Enterpriseefficiency.com. Before that he was an Assistant Editor at MIT Sloan Management Review, where he covered a wide range of business topics including IT, ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
David Wagner
50%
50%
David Wagner,
User Rank: Strategist
6/24/2015 | 12:47:18 PM
Re: enforcing standards
@kstaron- I think the one difference is that in the case of a work from home freelancer, the product the customer sees is the final product in a file. In the Uber case, the customer sees the car. If an uber driver picked me up and there was garbage and nasty stuff ont he floor, i might not use Uber again even though the other cars might be clean and I may never see that driver again.
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
How CIO Roles Will Change: The Future of Work
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/1/2021
Commentary
A Strategy to Aid Underserved Communities and Fill Tech Jobs
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/9/2021
Slideshows
10 Ways AI and ML Are Evolving
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/28/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
Video
Current Issue
Slideshows
Flash Poll