Interoperability Depends On EHR Vendors: AHA - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Healthcare // Analytics
06:50 PM

Interoperability Depends On EHR Vendors: AHA

Providers don't need more regulation -- they need fewer obstacles to complying, says hospital association in reply to government's request for information on interoperability.

5 Tools Connect Patients To Their Healthcare
5 Tools Connect Patients To Their Healthcare
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The American Hospital Association (AHA) does not want the federal government to impose more regulations on healthcare providers to encourage health information exchange.

It would, however, like the government to demand more from electronic health record (EHR) vendors to advance interoperability at several different levels, according to an AHA letter to the Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC). The AHA sent the letter in response to the ONC's request for information (RFI) on how to increase interoperability.

From the AHA's viewpoint, healthcare payment and delivery reforms, coupled with the government's Meaningful Use requirements, are all that's required to propel providers along the path to more effective health information exchange. What stands in the way of that, however, are external barriers. Hence the AHA would like ONC "to remove barriers for interoperability and support development of a robust infrastructure for health information exchange."

[ Are poorly designed electronic healthcare record systems driving medical personnel back to paper? Read Healthcare Workarounds Expose EHR Flaws. ]

"The federal government already has a remarkable number of requirements to share information," said Chantal Worzala, director of policy for the AHA, in an interview with InformationWeek Healthcare. "If you look at the Meaningful Use stage 2 requirements, whether you're reporting to public health or sending transition-of-care documents to the next provider when a patient leaves the hospital or is referred to another physician, those requirements already exist. Also, the rules require providers to give patients access to their information via a portal."

The challenge is that providers don't have the infrastructure in place to meet existing requirements, said Worzala. "So we'd prefer that the government focus on removing the barriers to the exchange that [is] required under Meaningful Use or [is] incentivized via programs like the Accountable Care Act," she said.

Among other things, the AHA letter said that EHR vendors should be required to use the same medical terminology for 2014 certification. However, the most important such requirement in the ONC's current certification criteria -- that all EHRs use the SNOMED-CT vocabulary for problem lists -- is an issue for AHA partly because it duplicates the ICD-10 coding system that the industry must move to next year. AHA said the ONC should require the ability to "cross-walk" from SNOMED to ICD-10 in certified EHRs.

Worzala noted that SNOMED is not widely used in the U.S., even though it was developed here. AHA is concerned that providers lack the technical and educational resources and the strategic plans to implement problem lists based on SNOMED by Oct. 1, 2013, when Meaningful Use Stage 2 goes into effect for hospitals. The key challenge seems to be that doctors aren't sure how well their diagnoses will be translated into a uniform terminology like SNOMED. So healthcare organizations would like to see the mapping to SNOMED better vetted and tested.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
1 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
4/30/2013 | 4:07:08 AM
re: Interoperability Depends On EHR Vendors: AHA
I completely agree that the first step towards interoperability
needs to happen on the back end, on the vendor side. If vendors donG«÷t work
towards being able to cooperate with other vendor systems, then any
preparations done by providers would be in vain. The technology and
capabilities have to be there in order for the providers to adapt their
workflows. Once the systems are in place then the providers can train and adapt
to meeting the new requirements.

Jay Simmons
Information Week Contributor
CIOs Face Decisions on Remote Work for Post-Pandemic Future
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  2/19/2021
11 Ways DevOps Is Evolving
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  2/18/2021
CRM Trends 2021: How the Pandemic Altered Customer Behavior Forever
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  2/18/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
Flash Poll