Healthcare Experts Confront EHR-Related Medical Errors - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Healthcare // Electronic Health Records
10:30 AM

Healthcare Experts Confront EHR-Related Medical Errors

AMIA task force calls on vendors, clinicians, academics and policy-makers to rethink poorly designed health IT systems.

 7 Portals Powering Patient Engagement
7 Portals Powering Patient Engagement
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Though questions about the efficacy of electronic health records (EHRs) seem to have increased recently, usability and safety of health IT systems have been on the minds of medical informaticists for a while.

The American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), which convened an EHR usability task force in late 2011, this week released a position paper on EHR usability in which the group called on multiple stakeholders to act in order to lessen the chance of patient harm from poorly designed and implemented technology.

In a position paper published online in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), Bethesda, Md.-based AMIA spelled out 10 recommendations in four areas: research into health IT-related human factors; health IT policy; vendors; and clinician end users.

"These AMIA recommendations are intended to stimulate informed debate, provide a plan to increase understanding of the impact of usability on the effective use of health IT, and lead to safer and higher quality care with the adoption of useful and usable EHR systems," the paper said.

[ Is government throwing our money away on health IT? See Healthcare IT: Savior Or Sinkhole? ]

"The fundamental approach to health IT needs to change," lead author Dr. Blackford Middleton, corporate director of clinical informatics research and development at Partners Healthcare System and 2013 AMIA chair-elect, told InformationWeek Healthcare. "We've been installing it and not measuring it like we would any other intervention."

It is time, Middleton said, to take a step back and assess the direction of health IT, EHRs and the federal Meaningful Use incentive program. "We were motivated by the mounting evidence that there were unintended and untoward consequences with using health IT," Middleton explained.

Middleton gave a preview of the report at the 2012 AMIA annual meeting in November, but AMIA would not allow the authors to grant interviews until the paper's publication. He noted that the U.S. government's Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has since issued a draft national patient safety plan based on a 2011 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report about the role of health IT in delivering safer care. ONC is taking public comments on the plan through Feb. 4.

AMIA called on the academic community to accelerate research into usability and human factors by standardizing use cases, developing a core set of measures for health IT-related adverse events and defining best practices for safe EHR implementation and usage.

On the policy front, the AMIA panel said ONC's policy framework should consider usability in the context of standardization and interoperability. Federal officials also should establish a reporting system for adverse events related to health IT, as the IOM called for in 2011, and create an educational program about safe and effective EHR use, the paper said.

For vendors, AMIA recommended that an industry coalition develop a common style guide for certain EHR functions related to patient safety to streamline training, much like all automobiles have similar information sources such as odometers and fuel gauges. Vendors also should conduct formal usability assessments on key EHR functions, AMIA said.

End users have responsibilities, too, according to AMIA. They should adopt best practices for EHR implementation and management, as well as monitor how clinicians use health IT systems and report any adverse events, the informatics group said.

"Following best practices for EHR implementation is essential to safe and effective use," the AMIA task force wrote. "User error may result in untoward outcomes and unintended negative consequences. These may also occur as a result of poor usability, and may also be an emergent property only demonstrated after system implementation or widespread use. User errors may occur without adverse events, and some may not even be apparent to the user, analyzed by hospital or clinic review boards, or reported to the vendor."

The AMIA usability task force included a diverse group from vendor companies, healthcare provider organizations, and academia. One of the members was University of Pennsylvania sociologist Ross Koppel, a longtime critic of major health IT vendors, which he considers barriers to true interoperability of health information. "The idea was to have a balanced number of industry people and academics," Middleton explained.

The policy statement concentrates on EHR usability, without considering medical devices, mobile devices, personal health records and other forms of health IT. Nor does the AMIA paper address potential EHR regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as had been discussed in the formative days of the Meaningful Use program.

Middleton said the FDA's interest in health IT would lie in clinical decision support for medical devices. But the FDA probably has not stepped in because there is a "learned intermediary" such as a physician or nurse, not devices, making actual clinical judgments.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Healthcare IT Systems
Healthcare IT Systems,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/11/2013 | 10:06:20 PM
re: Healthcare Experts Confront EHR-Related Medical Errors
This was a great article. EMRs are like every other electronic record and need to be monitored and measured. There's even more of an onus to do so because, after all, these are medical records. They are being installed at a rapid pace and most users are assuming all of the due diligence and been done "so not to worry". In fact any issues within these systems may not be evident for months or years. As the article suggested, it's time to take a step back...
User Rank: Apprentice
2/8/2013 | 10:25:57 PM
re: Healthcare Experts Confront EHR-Related Medical Errors
I like how the article states that not only do the companies that provide the EHR systems have responsibilities, but also the end users when it comes to analyzing the shortcomings of EHR systems. As with anything new that gets implemented there is always going to be errors that may not have been apparent to the providers of the systems but only become apparent after they have been implemented. It is up to all parties involved to work together to create better, more efficient systems to minimize the chance of patient harm. Vendors also should also follow the AMIA advice of developing common style guides for certain EHR functions, and use that as a step towards achieving greater interoperability.

Jay Simmons
InformationWeek Contributor
User Rank: Apprentice
2/1/2013 | 3:12:09 AM
re: Healthcare Experts Confront EHR-Related Medical Errors
Business intelligence can help hospitals get a better return on investment for their electronic health records. http://www.healthcaretownhall....
User Rank: Moderator
1/31/2013 | 8:56:46 PM
re: Healthcare Experts Confront EHR-Related Medical Errors
Common User Interface has been out there as Open Source from CodePlex from Microsoft since 2007. I ran around HIMSS with the demo on my tablet (in 2008 I was there to promote tablets with a vendor) and everyone asked me "which EMR system is that on my table" I told all what it was and what they could do with it, didn't and still doesn't cost a time. NHS did a lot of work with it as well as a doctor/programmer I know in New Zealand, he emulated it with non Microsoft computer language..a lot can be done. I have a few chats on the Code Plex board as well.

So today when all are looking at EMR clinical user interfaces for fine areas of patient endangerment and now having to look at many instead of one common one, well you have a bigger job as EHR vendors would not collaborate and building a better mouse trap for more money took over. If you do a search on my blog in addition to this link there's about 7-10 posts from 2007 to present time on this.

Having written an early EMR myself, I thought it was grand as I have face to face hands on experience building an interface and working close with doctors to make it work for them and if one has never done this you don't know and all you can do is repeat.

It was out there all the time and I gave it a ton of press as best I could, and MDs of course loved the idea as they love to learn 2-5 different EMR systems as many are on staff at different hospitals...NOT! Innovation without collaboration is fouling up the US Health care system, that was also I post I did a couple years ago.
CIOs Face Decisions on Remote Work for Post-Pandemic Future
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  2/19/2021
11 Ways DevOps Is Evolving
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  2/18/2021
CRM Trends 2021: How the Pandemic Altered Customer Behavior Forever
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  2/18/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
Flash Poll