GPL Vs. Free Software Foundation - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Enterprise Architecture
Commentary
9/25/2009
10:28 AM
Serdar Yegulalp
Serdar Yegulalp
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

GPL Vs. Free Software Foundation

After my post about the GPL's day in court in France, a programmer friend noted he no longer used the GPL for anything, now that its instigator, the Free Software Foundation, has (in his view) gone off a cliff. Do other people see the GPL as tainted because of the FSF's rather stentorian views?

After my post about the GPL's day in court in France, a programmer friend noted he no longer used the GPL for anything, now that its instigator, the Free Software Foundation, has (in his view) gone off a cliff. Do other people see the GPL as tainted because of the FSF's rather stentorian views?

A lot of my friend's unease with the GPL and the FSF has been building on and off for a while. A recent spate of events -- including the FSF's branding of GNOME/Mono developer Miguel de Icaza as a "traitor" for his involvement with Microsoft's CodePlex -- sealed the decision for him. He didn't want to publish any more software under the GPL as part of his way of distancing himself from the FSF generally.

That led to a question I asked myself later on: If people are repelled by the FSF's more outré opinions, do they see the GPL as being part of that?

Me, I don't think so. I've grown dismayed with the way the FSF has become the nagging aunt of the software world, more interested in rhetoric and denunciation than accomplishments. I'm not against criticism being levied where it's due, and I haven't exactly been fair in that department either (hey, I'm the one who called CloneZilla "ugly", remember?). But their criticism has devolved severely, and become partisanship by any other name.

That doesn't mean the GPL or the software created under it is without merit, though. The amount of terrific software out there released as GPL products speaks for itself. The GPL -- and the programs developed with it -- have a life of their own entirely outside of the FSF.

I hope it remains that way, too. All signs point to that being the case. Most people that I have seen adopt the GPL do so because of other software / projects / programmers that have also adopted it. They have the examples of others to draw on. The FSF and its rhetoric don't even come into the picture.

InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on Sun's future under Oracle. Download the report here (registration required).

Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
Slideshows
Flash Poll