What Makes Digital Projects Different (And What to Do About It) - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

02:00 PM
Matt McWha and Veena Variyam, CEB (Now Gartner)
Matt McWha and Veena Variyam, CEB (Now Gartner)

What Makes Digital Projects Different (And What to Do About It)

With 77% of executive priorities now dependent on technology, the composition of the project portfolio is shifting dramatically toward digital work. Legacy approaches to managing IT projects, programs and portfolios can't keep up with this shift.

Two-thirds of today’s business leaders believe that in order to maintain competitiveness, their companies must become significantly more digitized. As a result, key digital projects and programs are rapidly becoming a critical focus area for project management offices (PMOs) and their staff in most IT organizations.

So what makes digital initiatives different from traditional IT projects? Our conversations with business and IT leaders reveal seven critical attributes of digital projects that IT leaders and their PMO teams need to consider:

The demand for greater speed. Companies making digital bets don’t have the luxury of being slow. Unfortunately, the PMO function and project management processes are often seen as potential sources of delay by more than 80% of Agile delivery teams. While increasing speed is a key reason for expanding the use of Agile and other iterative delivery approaches, accelerating projects requires IT to go well beyond changing delivery processes. In fact, 86% of barriers to project speed identified by PMO leaders fall into three categories: sponsor-driven decision delays, subject matter expertise bottlenecks and a lack of clarity that speed should be a priority for project teams. Leading PMOs are addressing these challenges to drive real speed gains for digital work.

Uncertain financial returns. Many digital investments are experiments designed to test the viability of new business models or establish the existence of new markets. These test-and-learn efforts don’t usually lend themselves to easy financial benefits quantification, which is at the core of most IT investment approval and prioritization processes. To more effectively evaluate and fund digital work, IT organizations need to broaden the definition of "value" to avoid discriminating against investments with less certain benefit profiles.

Greater business ownership of project management. More than 50% of IT project work at the average organization is now managed by business partners or the contractors they hire. Increasing business partner ownership of project management activities require PMOs and their teams to provide a wider range of support. Leading IT organizations adapt their engagement posture based on the context of the work, flexing to meet business partner project management needs as they vary across business units and across time.

Coordination with non-digital demand and governance processes. Most companies will operate in a multi-methodology environment for the foreseeable future. That means IT needs to find a way to coordinate work being done in multiple ways (e.g., Waterfall, Scrum, XP) that have varying planning and delivery horizons. This requires PMOs to dramatically improve their approaches to surfacing, documenting and resolving interdependencies. In addition project management teams must also overcome challenges in coordinating with governance partners (e.g., Audit, Finance, and Information Risk), whose processes which often aren't flexible enough to easily accommodate digital work.

Funding flexibility.  As business partners rapidly test and learn from new digital experiments, priorities are constantly changing. The bottom-up, project-based model for funding work that most IT organizations use fails to support this pace of shifting priorities. To create the necessary funding flexibility, progressive IT organizations are moving toward top-down allocation of capital to product lines that align to the organization’s most critical business capabilities.

A premium on project manager’s "entrepreneurial" skills. Today’s process-focused project manager can’t adapt quickly enough to thrive in the dynamic digital environment. But those with ‘Entrepreneurial’ skills — like stakeholder partnership, learning agility and judgment— will thrive in this situation. Project managers with these skills can flex to play Scrum Master or even Product Owner roles, coordinate the work of multiple Agile teams, or lead cross-functional ‘fusion teams’.

An increasing focus on products over projects. More than half of IT organizations either operate in or are moving towards a product line-based model. This, along with increased adoption of Agile scaling approaches like SAFe (the Scaled Agile Framework) has spurred IT organizations to embrace the concept of ‘value streams’ where the focus of funding, resources and governance shifts from the level of the project to the level of the product. This focus on products over projects requires IT organizations to transform their approach to allocating dollars, staff and planning effort.

To help organizations realize the promise of their digital investments, the PMO and its staff need to adapt their approaches to managing and governing work, and concentrate on building the "Entrepreneurial" skills that will allow more effective partnership with the business stakeholders of digital work.

Matt McWha
Matt McWha

Matt McWha, practice leader at CEB now Gartner, works with senior IT leaders to enhance their understanding of governance, project, and portfolio management challenges. Veena Variyam, research director at CEB now Gartner, helps senior IT leaders increase the effectiveness of their project management talent and design their approaches to enabling Agile work.

The InformationWeek community brings together IT practitioners and industry experts with IT advice, education, and opinions. We strive to highlight technology executives and subject matter experts and use their knowledge and experiences to help our audience of IT ... View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
10/16/2017 | 12:13:18 PM
Great Insights! But from the Other side....
This is a really practical article with lots of insights. I work in a very large Enteprise PMO in a fortune 500 company and I can relate to many of these points . The challenge for PMO's is that the Project teams typically don't do much forward planning during the business case prep stage which raises a lot of questions on the investment, planning and risks. Further, Digital business cases look a lot like "artificially enhanced" business cases since many of the benefits are not that tangible causing skepticism in the governance. Lastly, with the funding challenges for discretionary investments, creating funding flexibility is a different challenge altogether. Digital is causing significant investments in replacing existing legacy apps, but that leaves little to experimentation for business or new business processes. Maybe when the markets improve, then there could be funding.
User Rank: Apprentice
10/13/2017 | 1:44:10 PM
Digital Projects actually aren't all that different
Good article on "What makes diigital projects different (and what to do about it)". The challenges are well laid out. What is to me very interesting is that the challenges are virtually identical to the historical reasons that projects have been failing for the past 20 years. For example: "sponsor-driven decision delays, subject matter expertise bottlenecks and a lack of clarity that speed should be a priority for project teams" have been headlines in the analysis of project failure for decades (Standish Group, Forbes, PMI and more). 

If looking through the lens of Digital means that we can start to honestly address the obstacles and overcome them, then I'm all for using Digital as the code name for 'just fixing what's been broken for a very long time." I am optimistic that the Digital lens may allow everyone to start afresh. My team and I have in fact built a transformation methodology desinged to keep the fresh, enthusiastic Digital lens from fogging up with the underlying business culture issues that drive failure. With a little luck and a lot of hard work, perhaps we can change the project success rates, dramatically. 

Barbara Lancaster

Managing Director, Kansys Bridge
User Rank: Apprentice
10/13/2017 | 6:44:57 AM
Useful information
The way you explained each point and maintained good balance b/w theory and practice is fabulous article. Thanks a bunch for sharing
Why 2021 May Turn Out to be a Great Year for Tech Startups
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  2/24/2021
How GIS Data Can Help Fix Vaccine Distribution
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  2/17/2021
11 Ways DevOps Is Evolving
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  2/18/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
Flash Poll