Are You Ready To Pay $2.50 For A Song Download?

As if the battle between Sony and Apple over the latest and greatest gadget that can play song downloads isn't enough, we are now faced with the decision whether to download music on PCs or have it pushed to our cell phones by wireless carriers as another "next generation" service.

Elena Malykhina, Technology Journalist

November 3, 2005

2 Min Read

As if the battle between Sony and Apple over the latest and greatest gadget that can play song downloads isn't enough, we are now faced with the decision whether to download music on PCs or have it pushed to our cell phones by wireless carriers as another "next generation" service.People have gone iPod-crazy. Whether at the gym or in the subway, literally every other person has their ears plugged with the infamous white earphones. Some people I know have designated certain hours of their week just for downloading the latest songs from iTunes.

No wonder others are trying to match Apple's successâ€"people just love customizable music.

In fact, there has been a lot of buzz around Sprint Nextel, Verizon Wireless, and Cingular planning to roll out over-the-air music services that would let cell phone users download music on their phones for $2 to $3 per song. But the prize goes to Sprint Nextel for being the first U.S. carrier to launch such a service this week. Sprint Nextel is now offering song previews, browsing, and downloading on cell phones for $2.50 per song.

Great concept, considering that cell phones (and mobile devices in general) have become an essential part of our lives. The carriers are thinking: "Why should people carry two separate devices--one for making calls and one for listening to music--when they can have an all-in-one package?" But end users might not be so optimistic paying $2.50 for a song plus air time charges. Meanwhile, they can get the same song at iTunes for 99 cents, not to mention, at much faster download speeds.

iTunes are not perfect. They don't work with MP3 players and can't be used to make CDs. Then again, there's Napster for that. The good thing is, nether Napster not iTunes subject people to monthly or yearly subscriptions, although Napster does offer memberships. Both provide the pay-per-song option, whereas Sprint Nextel only offers the service to its customers under a contract. For many music lovers, higher prices and long-term commitments might be too big of a price to pay for mobile convenience.

But I can't speak for everyone. So, comments are welcome. Are you compelled by the idea of listening to music on your cell phone and willing to pay the $2.50? Or are you content with good ol' iTunes?

About the Author(s)

Elena Malykhina

Technology Journalist

Elena Malykhina began her career at The Wall Street Journal, and her writing has appeared in various news media outlets, including Scientific American, Newsday, and the Associated Press. For several years, she was the online editor at Brandweek and later Adweek, where she followed the world of advertising. Having earned the nickname of "gadget girl," she is excited to be writing about technology again for InformationWeek, where she worked in the past as an associate editor covering the mobile and wireless space. She now writes about the federal government and NASA’s space missions on occasion.

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights