re: Apple Clean Cloud More Talk Than Walk: Greenpeace
More garbage from Greenpeace. The article doesn't tackle the errors that Greenpeace makes in its calculations. In fact, they been chided by a nu Ver of observers for either. It knowing the engineering involved, or making errors on purpose as a political stance to get more members.
Now, they're claiming that Apple plant will have a peak draw of 81 MW, down from their last claim of 100 MW. But Apple has released the figures, which show a peak of 20 MW. In addition, the filing papers for backup power and such show a maximum of 41 MW requests.
I've lost rest in Greenpeace decades ago. It would be good if articles like this tell the entire story, and stop using headlines made up to get hits instead of telling the truth.
Perhaps the headline should have been "Greenpeace again mischaracterizes Apple's power requirements for their data center".