N.Y. Times Data Center Indictment Misses Big Picture - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Cloud // Infrastructure as a Service
Commentary
9/24/2012
10:25 PM
Charles Babcock
Charles Babcock
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

N.Y. Times Data Center Indictment Misses Big Picture

A New York Times examination of increasing data center use and its environmental impact focuses on aging enterprise data centers. A more important issue: How much environmental benefit can we reap from today's modern cloud data centers?

A New York Times Sept. 22 article now causing heated conversation in the cloud computing community paints a gloomy picture of the average data center as a wastrel and energy glutton. In the eyes of the writer of the initial piece "The Cloud Factories: Power, Pollution and the Internet," data centers are prime suspects in the ongoing process of environmental degradation.

I am in total accord with the intent of the Times piece, seeking to make data centers more efficient. But I am dismayed at the casualties that the writer, James Glanz, inflicts as he goes about making his point. Surely, he realizes that the first part of the story describes an aging, mixed-system data center straight out of the 1980s or 1990s. Then he goes on to say that both the enterprise IT manager and cloud data center creator are culprits (two very different things lumped together). And, he concludes that the Internet user is an eager, witless accomplice to them both.

Either the Times underestimates the intelligence of its readers or it has lost touch with them. After all, it delights in publishing stories about the iPhone, and there are few drivers of data center construction that are equal to the use of smartphone apps. I don't remember reading about the dark side of iPhone 5 in all those iPhone 5 advance articles.

It's difficult, but what we should be trying to calculate is how to keep the economy growing with digital services, while protecting the environment.

Everyone is doing a lot more computing, as the story notes. But as we do so, the amount of electricity consumed per unit of computing is going down, which the story somehow misses. Nowhere does the Times address this salient point. Instead, it concludes we are doing a lot more computing and, therefore, we are all guilty of driving environmental degradation. If you're going to reform the world, you need to build a better soapbox than this.

[ Want to learn more about how Columbia Sportswear's cloud computing plans? See How Columbia Sportswear Will Survive Next Tsunami. ]

There's a lively discussion going on regarding these points at the New York Times' collection of related opinion columns, Big Data's Big Costs. "Is the convenience of cloud computing worth the energy and pollution it requires? Or should we wean off of 24/7 access?" are some of the questions asked.

Let me start with some contrary evidence. InformationWeek reported a year ago that the Environmental Protection Agency had predicted that between 2005 and 2010, the electricity consumed by data centers around the world would double, based on the rate of new construction. In 2011, the EPA had to back off that prediction because during that period, data center electricity consumption had increased by 36%, not 100%. The author of the study for the EPA speculated that the pace of data center construction had slowed, due to economic recession. I for one have driven around Silicon Valley looking for staked-out, but not-yet-built data centers; they're more scarce than Samsung handsets on Apple's Infinite Loop.

While some data centers were mothballed during the recession, most were built, and were much more efficient in using electricity than their predecessors. For example, PUE is the ratio of energy imported by a facility to the amount of power consumed by IT computing devices; it stands for Power Usage Effectiveness. The 1990s data center, with air conditioning pouring through a raised floor, and featuring a water-cooled mainframe at the center, had a PUE of 1.92 to 2. That means it consumed about twice as much power as the amount used in actual computing; cooling was the largest power consumer after computing itself.

Today, modern data centers built by Microsoft, Google, Facebook, or Yahoo have reduced that ratio to somewhere between 1.22 and 1.07--the latter mark set by Facebook's new Prineville, Ore., facility. This type of modern data center does so by delaying the stepping down of power line voltage until it's close to where servers and switches are running; that reduces the loss to resistance in the line. Instead of air conditioning, the modern data center uses ambient, outside air cooled by evaporation; the air is piped to the cool side of servers, blown into channels between baffles that steer it to the hottest components. Then it's collected in a hot aisle and flushed from the building. The process uses a fraction of the electricity of air conditioning.

The Times article doesn't mention PUE. It does cite a McKinsey study, commissioned by the newspaper, that found across several industries, the average server used only 6% to 12% of its available CPU cycles. To me, this describes the data center running one application per server, lest one application's activity overwrite the data of another (which causes a crash). In the past, InformationWeek has cited such a practice as utilizing 7% to 15% of the server, with the rest of the CPU cycles idled away. The practice reflects an IT manager's fear of downtime. At one time it was a realistic calculation that the business could afford the extra electricity, but it couldn't afford to go off the air for a few minutes or few hours.

But to some extent, the Times is busy pillorying a straw man. I don't know how to explain the McKinsey figures at this late date, but it's now 2012 and the times are a changin'. Maybe with his focus on the big picture, the writer missed the trend toward virtualization within the enterprise data center, where each server is loaded with 15 to 20 applications, or more. They run under lean hypervisor software, which manages CPU, memory, and I/O limits to avoid application conflicts. At sites where virtualization is used effectively, half or two-thirds of the number of physical servers formerly in use are now gone.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
greg schulz
50%
50%
greg schulz,
User Rank: Author
9/27/2012 | 1:05:28 PM
re: N.Y. Times Data Center Indictment Misses Big Picture
What the NY Times article accomplished was to get views, reads, hits, follow-up posts, stories referencing it and so forth all of which are moving bits and bytes of data through various data centers/cloud facilities and actually using those servers, storage, networking and other technologies that as they claim, may have been underutilized.

What the NY Times article also accomplished was to bring back to life some of the themes, claims, challenges and discussions of the 2008 era that while not all have been addressed, many are being implemented. These range from data footprint reduction (DFR) such as archiving, backup modernization, compression, dedupe, storage tiering, data management along with intelligent or smart cooling and power management, more effective power supplies and distribution, faster servers that can do more work within the same physical and energy density supporting more memory and IO. There is also virtualization being used for consolidation as well as agility, along with clouds, IO performance optimization with SSD and many many more.

One of the challenges with the NY Times article, however IMHO it might also be a good example of the data center facilities focused centric view around the Greengrid PUE metric as a means of gauging efficiency. The challenge around PUE as by itself, it only measures the efficiency of the facility as opposed to the effectiveness of the work being done by the servers, storage, networking, hardware, software and other occupants of those habitats of technology. Thus you can have a data center that looks to be efficient based on PUE, however if the hardware and software that support business functions is not effective, than you actually have an inefficient information factory.

On the other hand, you could use the NY Times point of view and cite a data center or cloud site as being inefficient, yet, if that site is productive in terms of the level of services being delivered (performance, availability/reliability, cost, work done per watt of energy, etc), you in fact would have an effective and productive information factory.

If it took as some have pointed out a year of research for the NY Times piece, IGm not sure what was done during that year because in 2008 while doing my normal day job as an independent IT advisory analyst and consultant, I also managed to research and write the book "The Green and Virtual Data Center" (CRC/Taylor and Francis) which is on the Intel Recommended Reading List for developers (shameless plug ;) )...

If you are interested in learning more about the above and related themes, here are some links that Im assuming the NY Times wont be interested in...

Green IT Confusion Continues, Opportunities Missed!
http://storageioblog.com/?p=59...

Green IT, Green Gap, Tiered Energy and Green Myths
http://storageioblog.com/?p=11...

The other Green Storage: Efficiency and Optimization
http://storageio.com/blog/?p=8...

Saving Money with Green IT: Time To Invest In Information Factories
http://storageio.com/blog/?p=7...

PUE, Are you Managing Power, Energy or Productivity?

http://storageio.com/blog/?p=7...

Shifting from energy avoidance to energy efficiency
http://storageio.com/blog/?p=5...

Green IT Confusion Continues, Opportunities Missed!
http://storageio.com/blog/?p=5...

Closing the Green Gap G Green washing may be endangered, however addressing real green issues is here to stay
http://storageio.com/blog/?p=7...

Aso http://storageio.com/book2.htm... where you can find some free chapter downloads and more reated material.

Cheers gs.

Greg Schulz

InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
News
How CIO Roles Will Change: The Future of Work
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/1/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
Slideshows
Flash Poll