No Easy Answers In Mac Virtualization Roundup - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Mobile & Wireless
Commentary
1/27/2010
10:47 AM
50%
50%

No Easy Answers In Mac Virtualization Roundup

So, which virtualization product is absolutely, positively the best option for running Windows on a Mac? Sorry -- you didn't really think the answer would be that easy, did you?

So, which virtualization product is absolutely, positively the best option for running Windows on a Mac? Sorry -- you didn't really think the answer would be that easy, did you?We talk a lot here about server virtualization software. But plenty of small business users rely on virtualization apps to run multiple OSes on their desktop systems. And plenty of those folks are Mac owners who want the ability to run Windows.

Macworld columnist Rob Griffiths has done a great job keeping track of the top virtualization apps for the Mac. A little over a year ago, he reviewed the three top contenders: VMware Fusion, Parallels Desktop, and Sun VirtualBox.

Which one came out on top? Griffiths' sage answer: It depends.

When a reviewer utters those two words, readers get annoyed. Sometimes, however, it's the truth.

This week, Griffiths is hosting a rematch. The names are familiar, although the version numbers have changed a bit. And if you're in a hurry to decide which one is The Winner, don't get your hopes up: In that case, the answer is, "Take your pick." Sorry to take the easy way out, but it's more-or-less true: All three are perfectly good apps. VirtualBox is the best--meaning the only--solution if you don't want to spend any money and have no need for fancy graphics or gaming; it's slower than the other two and missing some amenities that make the others easier to use. Fusion is the best solution if you need to use many, many different operating systems or if you want a program that's simple to use (but not dumbed down), with the fit-and-finish of a good Mac app. Parallels is best if you want speed and the highest total feature-count; it has both, as well some attendant complexity and an unfinished feel in spots, along with occasionally-risky updates. Based on these general guidelines, Griffiths' review does offer recommendations for a number of common use scenarios. If high-def video is a requirement for a Windows guest OS, for example, Parallels and Fusion are the best options. And if ease of use is a priority, he thinks Fusion generally comes out on top.

Don't Miss: NEW! Virtualization How-To Center

Fortunately, if you need more detailed information to make a choice, the article includes links to separate reviews of Fusion 3.0.1, Parallels Desktop 5 for Mac, and VirtualBox 3.1.2. Sometimes, picking the right solution is just a matter of downloading and testing each option yourself, and these reviews can give you the background information you need to conduct your evaluations.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
News
How to Create a Successful AI Program
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  10/14/2020
News
Think Like a Chief Innovation Officer and Get Work Done
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  10/13/2020
Slideshows
10 Trends Accelerating Edge Computing
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  10/8/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
[Special Report] Edge Computing: An IT Platform for the New Enterprise
Edge computing is poised to make a major splash within the next generation of corporate IT architectures. Here's what you need to know!
Slideshows
Flash Poll