Internet Of Things: Batteries Not Required - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Data Management // Hardware/Architectures

Internet Of Things: Batteries Not Required

University of Washington researchers have devised a battery-free way to connect low-powered devices and sensors to the Internet.

Internet Of Things: 8 Pioneering Ideas
Internet Of Things: 8 Pioneering Ideas
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Batteries are the bane of mobile devices and sensors. As a power source they're sometimes unreliable. They must be charged and/or replaced periodically, a maintenance issue that may not mesh with the Internet of Things (IoT), the emerging global network of sensors, embedded objects, and other wireless devices, many of which may require an alternative energy source.

The battery, one might argue, is the weak link in the IoT chain. But researchers at the University of Washington say they have a better idea: By culling energy from existing radio, TV, and wireless signals, they've developed a way to connect low-energy devices, such as sensors and wearables, to the Internet without the need for batteries or power cords.

In addition to using radio frequency as a power source, the UW engineers have found a way to reuse existing WiFi signals to provide Internet connectivity to battery-free devices, according to the University of Washington news site.

Called WiFi Backscatter, the technology is the first to connect battery-free devices to a WiFi infrastructure, the researchers claim. It builds upon earlier research that enabled low-power devices, such as temperature sensors, to harness energy from existing radio, TV, and wireless signals.

[Do we really want our devices talking behind our backs? See Internet Of Household Things: Convince Me.]

The challenge with this approach, however, is that traditional, low-power networks like WiFi and Bluetooth consume two to three orders of magnitude more power than can be gathered from TV, cellular, and WiFi transmissions, according to a University of Washington video on the subject.

Enter WiFi Backscatter, a communication mechanism that allows a radio frequency (RF)-powered device to encode data by either reflecting or not reflecting a WiFi router's signal. Off-the-shelf devices and sensors can detect changes to the WiFi signal strength generated by these reflections. Since WiFi Backscatter reflects -- but doesn't generate -- wireless signals, it can use less than 10 microwatts of power to communicate with networked devices, UW researchers claim.

(Source: University of Washington)
(Source: University of Washington)

"You might think, how could this possibly work when you have a low-power device making such a tiny change in the wireless signal? But the point is, if you're looking for specific patterns, you can find it among all the other WiFi reflections in an environment," said Joshua Smith, UW associate professor of computer science and engineering and electrical engineering, in the UW story.

WiFi Backscatter has attained communication rates of up to 1 kbps -- and ranges of up to 2.1 meters -- between devices. And while that's not too impressive from a real-world perspective, UW researchers plan to extend the technology's range to about 20 meters. They've also patents filed on the technology and intend to launch a company around it.

Wireless power technologies have been around since the time of Nikola Tesla, of course, but they've yet to replace the ubiquitous AC cord. Meanwhile, modern-day companies such as WiTricity and Intel are developing short-range methods to charge devices wirelessly as well.

"If Internet of Things devices are going to take off, we must provide connectivity to the potentially billions of battery-free devices that will be embedded in everyday objects," said Shyam Gollakota, a UW assistant professor of computer science and engineering, in the UW article. "We now have the ability to enable WiFi connectivity for devices while consuming orders of magnitude less power than what WiFi typically requires."

"One of the great things about WiFi Backscatter is that we can enable this functionality on your existing home WiFi router via only a software update, after which it would be able to communicate with various smart home sensors, IoT devices, etc. This removes a huge barrier for deployment to the consumer," Bryce Kellogg, a UW doctoral student in electrical engineering and Backscatter researcher, told InformationWeek via email.

The UW team will publish its findings this month at the Association for Computing Machinery's Special Interest Group on Data Communication conference in Chicago.

IT must support employees on the go as well as build mobile apps for customers. Both initiatives still have a long way to go. Get the new Frictionless IT: Mobility issue of InformationWeek Tech Digest today (free registration required).

Jeff Bertolucci is a technology journalist in Los Angeles who writes mostly for Kiplinger's Personal Finance, The Saturday Evening Post, and InformationWeek. View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
8/12/2014 | 1:19:39 PM
Enough power?
Doesn't seem like there would be enough power in a WiFi signal to power much of anything. True, a small device might not need much power, and its easy to imagine a super low power chip running the show. But wouldn't a reciever alone require more power than is present in a WiFi signal? I am not an electrical engineer, but this just doesn't seem right.
User Rank: Author
8/11/2014 | 9:47:06 PM
Re: with the battery issue out of the way...
@Thomas good point!
Charlie Babcock
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
8/11/2014 | 8:16:48 PM
Peets vs. Starbucks: Who's got the best backscatter collection?
The future competition between chi chi coffee ships may depend, not on whether they offer WiFi but whether they offer wireless backscatter. It may prove to be the service that pulls in customers, not the cappucinos or lattes. The opportunity for battery-less devices to function via use of "reflected" energy could someday even make the coffee passe. If we got over our caffein addiction, the possibiility of backscatter utilization could remain the reason for existence of periodic urban shops, populated by battery-powered and battery-less wireless device users, busily working away.
User Rank: Ninja
8/11/2014 | 7:31:06 PM
Re: batteries
Very cool technology. We all hate batteries, but must live within the confines of them for the time being.

However, technology like this will change that – or at least prolong the time that devices can last. This will be especially true for internet-enabled sensor systems. 
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
8/11/2014 | 4:13:31 PM
with the battery issue out of the way...
...all that remains is to demonstrate that consumers gain meaningful value from the Internet of Things. So far, I'm not quite convinced.
User Rank: Author
8/11/2014 | 10:47:44 AM
I'm so glad some have decided to address this problem. It is so frustrating to have your supposedly mobile device not function because it is not tethered into a power source. And I have yet to find any that truly live up to the "estimated" battery life.
2021 Outlook: Tackling Cloud Transformation Choices
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  1/4/2021
Enterprise IT Leaders Face Two Paths to AI
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  12/23/2020
10 IT Trends to Watch for in 2021
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/22/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
Flash Poll