Shovels As A Service In The Social Networking Gold Rush - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Infrastructure // PC & Servers
Commentary
10/30/2007
02:03 AM
Andy Dornan
Andy Dornan
Commentary
50%
50%

Shovels As A Service In The Social Networking Gold Rush

For this week's feature on Web 2.0 in the enterprise, we counted 17 startups that offer social networking platforms. I don't mean social networking sites (there are thousands of those), but companies touting technology for the FaceBook and MySpace wannabes.

For this week's feature on Web 2.0 in the enterprise, we counted 17 startups that offer social networking platforms. I don't mean social networking sites (there are thousands of those), but companies touting technology for the FaceBook and MySpace wannabes.

Everyone knows that selling picks and shovels is the surest way to get rich during a gold rush, so these companies could be on to something – or at least, they would be if so many hadn't come up with the same idea. The difference is that in keeping with the Web 2.0 fashion for online apps, most have set themselves up as Web-based service providers. Not so much selling shovels as renting them.

A service-based business model is great from the vendors' (or service-providers') point of view: It means they only need to make a sale once and can get paid over and over again. It's even better when the marginal cost of actually providing the service is close to zero.

Most important during a gold rush, it expands the market, thanks to lower costs of entry. (And compared with any other kind of media business, running a social networking site already has ridiculously low costs.) Renting is cheaper in the short term than buying, which attracts a lot more prospectors hoping to found a data mine. That means a lot more sites, all competing with each other and with traditional publishers for the same users and ad revenue.

I don't think all the startups are doomed. Many also offer other Web 2.0 technologies such as wikis, and some target behind-the-firewall intranets rather than public Web sites. But when the inevitable bust comes, pure-play social networking platforms could find that just one degree of separation from Bubble 2.0 isn't enough. The company that lost the most market cap in the first Internet crash wasn't Enron or WorldCom or Pets.com. It was Cisco, the king of the picks-and-shovels crowd.

In the long term, social networking is becoming a standard feature of most large Web sites, not an end in itself. I think this is behind Google's relative lack of interest in the space, as well as Facebook's API and push to become a host for third-party apps. On the intranet, where requirements are slightly different (assuming that intra-corporate social networking is useful at all, which it might not be), the startups face competition from bigger vendors such as IBM and BEA. It's a feature, not a product.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Commentary
Gartner Forecast Sees 7.3% Shrinkage in IT Spending for 2020
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/15/2020
Slideshows
10 Ways AI Is Transforming Enterprise Software
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  7/13/2020
Commentary
IT Career Paths You May Not Have Considered
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/30/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Key to Cloud Success: The Right Management
This IT Trend highlights some of the steps IT teams can take to keep their cloud environments running in a safe, efficient manner.
Slideshows
Flash Poll