Google Warns Not To 'Google' On Yahoo - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Applications
Commentary
10/25/2006
05:21 PM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Warns Not To 'Google' On Yahoo

If you use "google" as a verb, GoogleTM would like to correct your grammar. GoogleTM, you see, has become so successful that its trademarked name is in danger of becoming a generic term for searching online. As a post today on the Google blog points out, zipper, baby oil, brassiere, trampoline, thermos, cellophane, escalator, elevator, and dry

If you use "google" as a verb, GoogleTM would like to correct your grammar. GoogleTM, you see, has become so successful that its trademarked name is in danger of becoming a generic term for searching online.

As a post today on the Google blog points out, zipper, baby oil, brassiere, trampoline, thermos, cellophane, escalator, elevator, and dry ice made the transition from trademarked term to the vernacular. The same fate awaits GoogleTM, or so the company fears."A trademark is a word, name, symbol or device that identifies a particular company's products or services," Google's Michael Krantz writes in his company's blog. "Google is a trademark identifying Google Inc. and our search technology and services. While we're pleased that so many people think of us when they think of searching the web, let's face it, we do have a brand to protect, so we'd like to make clear that you should please only use 'Google' when you're actually referring to Google Inc. and our services."

Fat chance. It didn't work for Hormel, maker of SpamTM. And it's not going to work for GoogleTM.

While I understand why trademark law exists, and while I recognize that trademark law requires trademark owners to police their trademarks, I nonetheless find trademark law absurd. It's absurd because its goal is so fuzzy and ill-suited to reality.

Trademark law aims to prevent confusion among consumers about the provenance of goods and services. That's a laudable goal when it's applied to deliberate attempts to mislead people with counterfeit goods and services.

But it's a laughable goal when the fault lies with consumers. If, as the Google blog warns against, you write, "I googled him on Yahoo and he seems pretty interesting," you have either a strong sense of humor or an astonishing capacity for cluelessness. Either way, trademark law won't help.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Slideshows
11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
News
Time to Shift Your Job Search Out of Neutral
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  3/31/2021
Commentary
Does Identity Hinder Hybrid-Cloud and Multi-Cloud Adoption?
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  4/1/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Slideshows
Flash Poll