Google Pursues Legal Fight Against Microsoft In Federal Court - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Applications
Commentary
9/26/2005
08:20 PM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Pursues Legal Fight Against Microsoft In Federal Court

It appears that Google doesn't much care for Microsoft's offer to settle its lawsuit to enforce former researcher Kai-Fu Lee's employment agreement. The search company on Friday filed additional documents in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Calif., arguing against Microsoft's motion to dismiss Google's federal countersuit.

It appears that Google doesn't much care for Microsoft's offer to settle its lawsuit to enforce former researcher Kai-Fu Lee's employment agreement. The search company on Friday filed additional documents in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Calif., arguing against Microsoft's motion to dismiss Google's federal countersuit.On Sept. 13, Microsoft won a preliminary injunction in a Washington State court that prevents Lee from working for Google in a substantive capacity. Come mid-October, Google will have a chance to undo that order if it can convince federal judge Ronald Whyte that the laws of California and not Washington should be used to settle the dispute over Lee's employment.

With regard to employment contracts, the state laws of California and Washington differ considerably: Washington allows noncompete clauses if they're found to be "reasonable." California doesn't recognize them at all.

Citing California policy, Google's attorneys note that an employee's interest in his or her mobility and career betterment trumps a company's interest in limiting competition when no laws have been broken. This policy against noncompetition clauses, they argue, "has been credited as a major reason for the success of the Silicon Valley."

People used to credit stock options. That was back when they were worth something.

In an era of increased employee mobility and increased reliance on intellectual assets, the Kai-Fu Lee dispute raises difficult questions. Is Microsoft justified in placing its business interests above the business interests of an individual? Did Kai-Fu Lee break any laws when contemplating and planning his change of corporate loyalties? What do employees owe employers and vice versa?

It would, of course, be easier to ignore all these questions and let Microsoft duke it out with Google in a game of Red Rover. You know it'd be fun to see Steve Ballmer call out, "Red rover, red rover, send Eric Schmidt over!"

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Slideshows
What Digital Transformation Is (And Isn't)
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/4/2019
Commentary
Watch Out for New Barriers to Faster Software Development
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  12/3/2019
Commentary
If DevOps Is So Awesome, Why Is Your Initiative Failing?
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  12/2/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll