Google Ordered To Reveal Defamatory Blogger's Identity - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Applications
Commentary
8/19/2009
05:07 PM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Ordered To Reveal Defamatory Blogger's Identity

Bloggers who hide behind screen names to insult people may find that online pseudonyms don't really conceal one's identity.

Bloggers who hide behind screen names to insult people may find that online pseudonyms don't really conceal one's identity.A New York state supreme court judge has ordered Google to reveal a blogger's account information to model Liskula Cohen so that she can pursue a defamation claim arising from a post last year on a Google-hosted blog.

The post at issue, titled "Skanks in NYC," was published in August 2008 though Google's Blogger service and was subsequently removed. It included pictures of Cohen in suggestive poses and referred to her using the terms "psychotic," "lying," "whoring," and "skank."

Cohen filed her suit to force Google to reveal the blogger in January and many observers were skeptical about her chance of success.

Judge Joan Madden's decision just improved those odds. Google, which resisted providing the information to adhere to its privacy policy, has revealed the blogger's e-mail address.

Cohen, in an interview on Google Morning America, said she knew the women who used that e-mail address and dismissed her as "an irrelevant person in my life."

Cohen said she spoke to the woman on the phone and said that she forgave her. "I know who it is. I know why she did it: She doesn't have anything else to do. It's sad." She said she intended to proceed with a defamation lawsuit, but added that an apology, which has not yet been offered, might change the situation.

In the interview, Cohen's attorney, Steven Wagner, characterized the judge's decision as a signal that "the Internet is no longer a safe harbor for defamatory language."

The decision might also be seen as a signal to post defamatory speech on a blog hosted abroad by a company isn't likely to comply with U.S. court orders.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Slideshows
10 Ways to Prepare Your IT Organization for the Next Crisis
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  5/20/2020
News
IT Spending Forecast: Unfortunately, It's Going to Hurt
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  5/15/2020
Commentary
Helping Developers and Enterprises Answer the Skills Dilemma
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  5/19/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Key to Cloud Success: The Right Management
This IT Trend highlights some of the steps IT teams can take to keep their cloud environments running in a safe, efficient manner.
Slideshows
Flash Poll