Google Enhances Patent Search Service - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Healthcare // Analytics
News
8/14/2012
05:33 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Enhances Patent Search Service

Prior Art Finder should help simplify patent research, to the benefit of companies making infringement claims and defending against them.

Google I/O: 10 Awesome Visions
Google I/O: 10 Awesome Visions
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Google, the target of more than a hundred patent lawsuits in the past decade, has expanded the scope of its patent search capabilities and added a new search tool to help those investigating patent claims.

To its database of patents filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office--a separate search service when introduced in 2006 and recently integrated with Google Search--Google has added patents filed with the European Patent Office.

In addition, the company has added a tool called Prior Art Finder. "Prior art" is a legal term for records of innovation that preceded a specific patent claim.

"Typically, patents are granted only if an invention is new and not obvious," explains Google engineering manager Jon Orwant in a blog post. "To explain why an invention is new, inventors will usually cite prior art such as earlier patent applications or journal articles. Determining the novelty of a patent can be difficult, requiring a laborious search through many sources, and so we've built a Prior Art Finder to make this process easier."

[ Google is making changes in a number of areas. Read Google Cuts 4,000 Motorola Mobility Jobs. ]

Prior Art Finder culls key phrases from existing patent listings and searches for them in Google Patents, Google Scholar, and Google Books, as well as the rest of the Internet.

Google last year complained about "the explosion in patent litigation, often involving low-quality software patents, which threatens to stifle innovation," as Kent Walker, Google SVP and general counsel, put it. Its Prior Art Finder could help by reducing the granting of patents that don't represent genuine innovation and by helping companies accused of patent infringement identify prior art that may invalidate an infringement claim.

Dennis Crouch, associate professor of law at the University of Missouri School of Law and the author of the law blog Patently-O, notes on his blog that every technique used for identifying prior art has shortcomings. "The proper question for Google's tools is whether the new system has a role in the patenting process," he says. "At minimum, it is likely an improvement on the quick pre-filing 'sanity check' searches that are often conducted by patent applicants and patent attorneys."

However, Patrick Anderson, president of IP research service Patent Calls and author of the blog Gametime IP, proposes a different name for Google's Prior Art Finder: "Infringement Finder." He argues that finding patents issued later than the source patent, rather than earlier, can help identify potential infringement.

"By speeding up access to information that may lead to evidence of infringement, Google puts more power back into the hands of inventors and patent owners," he writes, noting that Google has invested significantly in patents through acquisitions like Motorola Mobility.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
beancube
50%
50%
beancube,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/16/2012 | 11:03:17 PM
re: Google Enhances Patent Search Service
It is not about how people can search existing patents. The problem is there are too many bogus patents that the authorities gave away. Many Intellect Properties laws themselves are bogus as well shielded by standard authorities' broad words and bogus court proceedings. The existing Patents system is a religion making laws for frauds and thieves only. Search them faster makes no difference. Patents law should be replaced a quality driven platform, no more creativity repression. Brand names of products would be protected only quality are reached.
Slideshows
Data Science: How the Pandemic Has Affected 10 Popular Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  9/9/2020
Commentary
The Growing Security Priority for DevOps and Cloud Migration
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  9/3/2020
Commentary
Dark Side of AI: How to Make Artificial Intelligence Trustworthy
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  9/15/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT Automation Transforms Network Management
In this special report we will examine the layers of automation and orchestration in IT operations, and how they can provide high availability and greater scale for modern applications and business demands.
Slideshows
Flash Poll