The Ultimate Wearable? It's 'Invisible' - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
10/7/2014
10:36 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The Ultimate Wearable? It's 'Invisible'

Wearables and other digital devices should be heard and not seen, says product design consultant Stuart Karten.

IT Dress Code: 10 Cardinal Sins
IT Dress Code: 10 Cardinal Sins
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

If you build wearable devices and haven't yet seen the 2013 movie 'Her,' in which a lonely writer falls in love with his computer's "virtual human" operating system, perhaps you should.

Or so suggests Stuart Karten, president of Karten Design, a Los Angeles-based industrial design consulting firm that's worked with a variety of major consumer and medical device manufacturers, including Samsung, Procter & Gamble, and Medtronic.

Karten was one of several speakers at last Friday's Body Computing Conference at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles (USC). His message: The best digital devices are unobtrusive and integrate seamlessly into our daily lives. In a sense, they're "invisible."

Which brings us "Her." So what's the connection?

"It's a love story between a man and his technology," Karten told the conference audience of medical, investing, and tech industry professionals. "Technology is seamlessly integrated into his entire life."

(Image credit: Keoni Cabral via Flickr)
(Image credit: Keoni Cabral via Flickr)

Samantha, the voice-controlled OS and object of the protagonist's affection, is a powerful "virtual human" capable of complex interactions that seem effortless.

[It is hard to make drones invisible. Read A Drone To Watch Over Me.]

"First of all, she's powerful -- huge computer platform in the background, algorithms at work," said Karten. "She's ubiquitous, she follows him everywhere, and she's intuitive. He speaks to her in natural language, and there's no friction between him and the interface."

But what's most compelling about Samantha and the digital devices of "Her" is what you don't see.

"You don't see sensors, you don't see electronics, and even the devices are minimalized," said Karten.

The hardware, in fact, isn't designed to stand out or make a statement, nor is the user interface.

"There's no glossy white, matte black, glass, aluminum," Karten added. "It's so human. It's informal. It's natural. No awkward sentence constructions like 'open Google' or 'weather in Detroit.'"

By comparison, today's device makers (and many consumers) are "obsessed" with screen size, resolution, thickness, gestures, and "bendability," Karten said.

This may change soon enough, though.

"I believe the future of our interaction with technology will … be invisible," Karten predicted. "We will need to camouflage our devices. We will need to make them less intrusive."

Today's wearables have many good qualities, of course, such as the ability to affect behavior change (e.g., exercise daily) and deliver fast access to relevant data. But their truth value as a mainstream digital device is still unclear.

Said Karten of wearables: "You put them on your body and you can take them off. They're not fully integrated into your life. So my perspective is that wearables are a step toward something much bigger and better."

So what's really the next big thing? Perhaps a natural-language audio interface not unlike what's shown in "Her."

"What everybody wants is to bring information to people -- when and where they want it -- to allow us to interface with the digital and real world," said Karten.

But today's wearables often create a barrier between those worlds, resulting in a public boredom or backlash. Consider, for instance, the "glasshole" pejorative hurled at early adopters of Google Glass. (Karten wondered if people who check their wrist wearables too often might soon be labeled "glanceholes.")

Device designers must move beyond wearables and focus on "invisibility" to keep users engaged, Karten stressed.

"As a designer, I'm keenly involved in the interface between technology and people," he said. "We design to surprise and delight people. We also design products that have to do with life and death. And the ability to reduce the friction between people and technology has a huge effect on whether or not people will adopt that technology."

You've realized the easy gains from SaaS. Now it's time to dig into PaaS, performance, and more. Get the new Your Next Cloud Move issue of InformationWeek Tech Digest today. (Free registration required.)

Jeff Bertolucci is a technology journalist in Los Angeles who writes mostly for Kiplinger's Personal Finance, The Saturday Evening Post, and InformationWeek. View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tzubair
50%
50%
tzubair,
User Rank: Ninja
10/13/2014 | 8:37:57 AM
Re : Invisible wearable
I think if this techonology is extended to healthcare, it will take care of the cosmetic cocerns that occur with the use of hearing ads and other medical devices that have to be worn for life. 
PedroGonzales
50%
50%
PedroGonzales,
User Rank: Ninja
10/7/2014 | 11:21:56 PM
Re: Invisibility
wearable biosensors today continue to be obtrusive and bulky.  I think making them invisible would really make them appeal to the majority of people.  I agree that product designers should strive for computers to interact with people in a more natural way.  If the touchscreen interface is the best we can do, we have a long way to go.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
10/7/2014 | 7:10:40 PM
Invisibility
Invisibility matters for wearable biosensors. It doesn't make sense if you're talking about a wearable display or a wearable touch controller.

More than visbility, I'd be concerned with purpose. There are a few reasons a device should be wearable: It receives or transmits information to or from the body; it gains energy by being worn; or it identifies/authenticates the wearer and cannot easily be removed. 

Unfortunately, many wearables do not need to be worn.
Slideshows
What Digital Transformation Is (And Isn't)
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/4/2019
Commentary
Watch Out for New Barriers to Faster Software Development
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  12/3/2019
Commentary
If DevOps Is So Awesome, Why Is Your Initiative Failing?
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  12/2/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Getting Started With Emerging Technologies
Looking to help your enterprise IT team ease the stress of putting new/emerging technologies such as AI, machine learning and IoT to work for their organizations? There are a few ways to get off on the right foot. In this report we share some expert advice on how to approach some of these seemingly daunting tech challenges.
Slideshows
Flash Poll