FTDI CEO Fred Dart responds
Fred Dart the CEO of FTDI downplayed the allged problems created by the company's decision to brick counterfeit chips and insisted that a majority of its customers were not affected by it at all. Here are his emaled comments in their entirety: Jai Vijayan.
Although in certain parts of the media it has been implied that there was some form of counterfeit detection algorithm in FTDI's latest driver, this was in fact absolutely untrue. There was no mechanism of that description in place and hence no flagging up of a counterfeit device ever occurred. Exactly the same commands were sent to a genuine chip as to a counterfeit chip. Some counterfeit devices simply failed to handle certain commands correctly (again something that's shows their lack of suitability for use in serious electronic system design) and they simply quarantined themselves.
Actually this whole episode has not affected our large or medium customers at all. They haven't been hindered in any way as they source chips either directly from us or via our global distribution partners (such as Farnell and Digi-Key). Even the vast majority of smaller customers have not been impacted and we have been liaising directly with those who have had concerns, in order to ensure that they have genuine FTDI chips. Our priority has always been to make totally sure that our customer base is not inconvenienced. In Asia in particular sales have been actually boosted as people are coming to us rather than certain other less reliable sources so that they can guarantee they have real FTDI silicon and not fakes. Board level products featuring FTDI ICs from Sparkfun, Elektor and Adafruit, among others, are in no way harmed either.
With regard to critical infrastructure - no FTDI definitely has not had any concerns from clients in this area. For such applications engineers are obviously very careful about the source of the ICs they specify. If they incorporated inferior chips into a design then they would be leaving themselves exposed to the possibility that an operational failure might occur when in-situ. They simply can't afford to put themselves in that position, that's why they deal directly with us or with our distributors.
If you get a genuine FTDI USB chip, as opposed to a counterfeit one, there is complete assurance of its continued operation and long term reliability. The company puts all its products through rigorous testing, with USB-IF, WHQL and ESD protection certification all secured. With counterfeit chips none of this effort or engineering resource has been invested into their manufacture, as a result there is a constant risk of them failing and potentially having serious repercussions for those who sourced them. In addition FTDI USB chips can rely on well tested drivers, firmware and software development tools, plus high response technical support is available to deal with customer queries.
Furthermore, FTDI USB chips employ a hard-wired state machine approach, whereas counterfeit devices will use programmable microcontrollers. This means that they aren't anything like as highly optimised and as a result can't match the performance levels set by FTDI devices.
The threat to the semiconductor industry that counterfeiting poses is growing all the time. It is similar to what the film and music businesses are currently seeing - with DVD and album sales dropping dramatically due to pirate copies and illegal downloads sites. This is likely to have a long term effect on creativity, as the investments that chip manufacturers (just like music labels and Hollywood studios) can make in bringing innovative products to market will be smaller and smaller, since their revenue streams are getting diverted to counterfeiters. The semiconductor companies and their distributors, as well as industry bodies like the SIA, need to address the problem now before it is too late.
FTDI has shown itself to be very proactive in combatting the issue of counterfeiting and will continue to be vigilant. The company is working closely with the US customs on this. It is also attempting to take action in the Chinese law courts to prosecute infringers. The hope is that the seriousness of the problem is now beginning to be realized and everyone in the electronics engineering community will do their best to stamp out counterfeiting, as this will benefit the ongoing progression of technology and encourage future technological advances
Fred Dart, CEO, FTDI